2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-015-1445-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping of a major gene for the slow ripening character in peach: co-location with the maturity date gene and development of a candidate gene-based diagnostic marker for its selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A marker developed for this locus cosegregated with the SR trait and showed no amplification in the case of the srsr genotypes, suggesting that there is a large deletion in the MD region including the ppa008301m sequence. Hence, it is possible that the absence of the product of the PpNAC1 gene causes the SR phenotype (Eduardo et al, 2015). These results all confirm that LG4 has a major effect on biochemical processes related to fruit maturation in peach.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…A marker developed for this locus cosegregated with the SR trait and showed no amplification in the case of the srsr genotypes, suggesting that there is a large deletion in the MD region including the ppa008301m sequence. Hence, it is possible that the absence of the product of the PpNAC1 gene causes the SR phenotype (Eduardo et al, 2015). These results all confirm that LG4 has a major effect on biochemical processes related to fruit maturation in peach.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The gene ppa021959m may be involved in deletion events since it encodes a putative transposase. On the other hand, SR individuals in the F1 population of the cross between BBelbinette^and BNectalady^(Bb × Nl) were identified by Eduardo et al (2015). The Sr gene was located in LG4 on the Bb × Nl genetic map in the same region of the gene ANAC072 and co-located with the CPP15636 and PSR2 markers.…”
Section: Candidate Genes For M Md and Srmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been carried out for QTL identification in Prunus (Zeballos 2012). Nevertheless, many important agronomic traits of Prunus species have not yet been mapped, and only a few are currently being used for marker-assisted selection (including major genes for disease and pest resistance, self-incompatibility, slow ripening, and fruit quality traits such as flesh color, endocarp staining, flesh adherence to stone, non-acid fruit, skin pubescence, skin color, and fruit shape) (Dirlewanger et al 2004;Eduardo et al 2015;Ru et al 2015 and references therein). Important QTLs that control fruit quality traits have been found for total sugar content, organic acid content, fruit weight, acidity, blooming and harvest dates (Dirlewanger et al 1999;Etienne et al 2002;Quilot et al 2004), blooming and ripening dates Dirlewanger et al 2012), chilling injury susceptibility (Cantín et al 2010a), and other traits anchored in the T × E Prunus reference map that have been widely described by Arús et al (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%