2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-012-0388-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping of alpha-neo-endorphin- and neurokinin B-immunoreactivity in the human brainstem

Abstract: We have studied the distribution of alpha-neo-endorphin- or neurokinin B-immunoreactive fibres and cell bodies in the adult human brainstem with no prior history of neurological or psychiatric disease. A low density of alpha-neo-endorphin-immunoreactive cell bodies was only observed in the medullary central gray matter and in the spinal trigeminal nucleus (gelatinosa part). Alpha-neo-endorphin-immunoreactive fibres were moderately distributed throughout the human brainstem. A high density of alpha-neo-endorphi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously reported (Duque et al, 2013;Coveñas et al, 2014), mapping was carried out according to Haines' atlas of the human brain and the same atlas was used for the terminology of the brainstem nuclei (Haines, 2012). The number of immunoreactive cell bodies appearing was counted and neuronal density was classified as previously reported (Coveñas et al, 2014): a high density of immunoreactive perikarya was considered when more than 20 profiles/region/section/nucleus were found; density was considered to be moderate when 10-20 profiles/region/section/nucleus were found, and density was low when fewer than 10 profiles/region/section/nucleus were found.…”
Section: Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously reported (Duque et al, 2013;Coveñas et al, 2014), mapping was carried out according to Haines' atlas of the human brain and the same atlas was used for the terminology of the brainstem nuclei (Haines, 2012). The number of immunoreactive cell bodies appearing was counted and neuronal density was classified as previously reported (Coveñas et al, 2014): a high density of immunoreactive perikarya was considered when more than 20 profiles/region/section/nucleus were found; density was considered to be moderate when 10-20 profiles/region/section/nucleus were found, and density was low when fewer than 10 profiles/region/section/nucleus were found.…”
Section: Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of alpha‐neoendorphin‐immunoreactive structures (fibres/perikarya) has been reported in the brainstem of several species (human, monkey, dog, cat) (Coveñas, Duque, Mangas, Marcos, & Narváez, ; Duque et al., ; Marcos et al., ; Pesini, Pego‐Reigosa, Tramu, & Coveñas, ). In many brainstem nuclei of the dog and cat the presence of cell bodies containing alpha‐neoendorphin has been observed (Marcos et al., ; Pesini et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the brainstem of both species a more widespread distribution of cell bodies containing alpha‐neoendorphin was observed in comparison with that found in primates (monkey, human); this was due to the administration of colchicine in the dog and cat. In the brainstem of humans and monkeys (not treated with colchicine), the distribution of alpha‐neoendorphin‐immunoreactive perikarya was very restricted: cell bodies containing the peptide were only observed in the medullary central gray matter/spinal trigeminal nucleus (human) and in the latter nucleus (monkey) (Coveñas et al., ; Duque et al., ). However, in alpacas not treated with the drug, no immunoreactive cell body was observed in the brainstem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations