2017
DOI: 10.5958/0975-6906.2018.00014.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping of molecular markers linked with MYMIV and yield attributing traits in mungbean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several maps have been constructed for mung bean with different marker types: RFLP ( Young et al, 1992 ; Lambrides et al, 2000 ; Humphry et al, 2002 ), AFLP ( Chaitieng et al, 2002 ), and SSR ( Kajonphol et al, 2012 ; Sompong et al, 2012 ; Liu et al, 2016 ; Wang et al, 2016 ; Singh et al, 2018 ). The frequent development of SSR had made them popular both in map construction and gene tagging for more than a decade ( Han et al, 2005 ; Wang et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several maps have been constructed for mung bean with different marker types: RFLP ( Young et al, 1992 ; Lambrides et al, 2000 ; Humphry et al, 2002 ), AFLP ( Chaitieng et al, 2002 ), and SSR ( Kajonphol et al, 2012 ; Sompong et al, 2012 ; Liu et al, 2016 ; Wang et al, 2016 ; Singh et al, 2018 ). The frequent development of SSR had made them popular both in map construction and gene tagging for more than a decade ( Han et al, 2005 ; Wang et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linkage map construction and gene mapping are important for genetic and genomic studies. A number of genetic linkage maps for mung bean, based mainly on restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLPs) ( Young et al, 1992 ; Chaitieng et al, 2002 ; Humphry et al, 2002 ) or simple sequence repeats (SSRs) ( Kajonphol et al, 2012 ; Sompong et al, 2012 ; Wang et al, 2016 ; Singh et al, 2018 ), have been reported previously. However, most of these maps were low density because of the limited number of polymorphic markers, although primarily mappings of genes associated with bruchid resistance ( Chen et al, 2012 ; Wang et al, 2016 ), domesticated traits ( Isemura et al, 2012 ), and agronomic traits ( Kajonphol et al, 2012 ) were reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, though mungbean is a minor crop, low funds inputs limit the population size for phenotypic analysis and ultimately result the mapping of simple oligogenic or monogenic traits. Examples of some important traits recently mapped in mungbean are tolerance to drought and high heat stress (Liu et al, 2017), development in seed starch content (Masariet al,2017), salinity tolerance (Chankaew et al, 2014), resistance to powdery mildew disease (Poolsawat et al, 2017), yellow mosaic virus disease (Singh et al, 2017), and bruchid resistance (Schafleitner et al, 2016, Kaewwongwal et al, 2017 which needs further validation experiments.…”
Section: Characteristic Features Genes Involved Reference Growth Habitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genome-wide association genetics is clearing the way for mapping agronomically important traits, but the low funds put into minor crops, such as mungbean, limits the population size for phenotyping and ultimately confines these efforts mainly to simple oligogenic or monogenic traits, and mapping bi-parental populations. Examples of traits recently mapped in mungbean are drought tolerance [23], seed starch content [24], high iron and zinc [25], salt tolerance [11] and resistance to powdery mildew [26], MYMD [27], and, as mentioned above, bruchid resistance [19] [20]. For most mapped loci, validation of their value for breeding is still lacking.…”
Section: Adaption Strategies and Breeding Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%