2016
DOI: 10.1080/1533256x.2016.1200055
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the Evidence to Improve Retention Rates in Addiction Services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The qualitative and quantitative findings support the feasibility and acceptability of SMART Track and lend insight into avenues for enhancing sustained engagement. Low rates of engagement and high rates of attrition are known challenges for services working with participants who experience substance use and mental health–related difficulties [ 119 ]. Sustained engagement with mHealth apps is notoriously difficult to achieve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The qualitative and quantitative findings support the feasibility and acceptability of SMART Track and lend insight into avenues for enhancing sustained engagement. Low rates of engagement and high rates of attrition are known challenges for services working with participants who experience substance use and mental health–related difficulties [ 119 ]. Sustained engagement with mHealth apps is notoriously difficult to achieve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the dimension most often associated with dropout likelihood is a younger age (Brorson et al, 2013;Perkins et al, 2016;Stevens et al, 2013;Vafaeinasab et al, 2015).…”
Section: Factors Predicting Dropout Of Addiction-specialized Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scepticism regarding the perceived relevance of the outcome(s) assessed and/or feedback generated has also been noted (31,32). Within addiction services, client engagement, retention and follow-up are well-documented challenges (33), therefore the introduction of ROM instruments must be brief and the turn-around of feedback rapid (13). Few of the validated tools developed to assess treatment outcome within drug and alcohol settings [e.g., Addiction Severity Index (34)], have been investigated within the context of ROM and feedback (13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%