2002
DOI: 10.2307/3712470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marginality as a Societal Position of Religion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models such as the market model are useful, more or less, but they are not total explanations. One would not want to deny the relevance of other approaches, such as ones based on identity (Mol, 1985), diffusion (Montgomery, 2002), or marginality as a counterpoint to the macro-structures of power in a society (Blasi, 2002). One would not want to proceed as if monism in science were a virtue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models such as the market model are useful, more or less, but they are not total explanations. One would not want to deny the relevance of other approaches, such as ones based on identity (Mol, 1985), diffusion (Montgomery, 2002), or marginality as a counterpoint to the macro-structures of power in a society (Blasi, 2002). One would not want to proceed as if monism in science were a virtue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite Weber's and Durkheim's predictions, it appears that religion is not declining; rather, the construct of religion is changing from one that focused on the institution to one that focuses on human potential (Blasi, 2002;Pargament, Magyar-Russell and Murray-Swank, 2005). For example, Davie (2007), describing the British context, concludes that individuals are increasingly willing to express belief without belonging to a faith community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To disentangle spiritual authority and theological expertise, to implement a genuine epistemic option for the margins, 43 to bring restorative epistemic justice to the margins over against the centre, a truly centreless theology is necessary. In exploring modes of distributed theology, we might be able to bring both implicit and explicit forms of knowledge into productive and empowering exchange as well as to link academic theology back to the life expression of faith communities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%