2008
DOI: 10.1017/s0033822200033579
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marine Reservoir Corrections: St. Helena, South Atlantic Ocean

Abstract: ABSTRACT. We present the first marine reservoir age and ∆R determination for the island of St. Helena using marine mollusk radiocarbon dates obtained from an historical context of known age. This represents the first marine reservoir age and ∆R determination in the southern Atlantic Ocean within thousands of kilometers of the island. The depletion of 14 C in the shells indicates a rather larger reservoir age for that portion of the surface Atlantic than models indicate. The implication is that upwelling old wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
7
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a 25% SAW fraction in TSW, similarly as in SMW, and NEC ∆ 14 C at ~–39‰ in ~1835 (Goodkin et al 2012) (Table 2), one may calculate a ∆ 14 C value of the SEC at –85‰ when ∆ 14 C is ~–50‰ in 1835 off Martinique. This calculated value is identical to the one determined at ~–85‰ in AD 1815–1835 at Santa Helena located within the southern branch of the SEC (Lewis et al 2008). To augment the ∆ 14 C near Martinique by ~5‰ such as from 1835 to 1845, the SAW fraction might be reduced from 25% to 15%.…”
Section: Comparison Of R and ∆14c In Chancel 1 And In Corals And Sclesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using a 25% SAW fraction in TSW, similarly as in SMW, and NEC ∆ 14 C at ~–39‰ in ~1835 (Goodkin et al 2012) (Table 2), one may calculate a ∆ 14 C value of the SEC at –85‰ when ∆ 14 C is ~–50‰ in 1835 off Martinique. This calculated value is identical to the one determined at ~–85‰ in AD 1815–1835 at Santa Helena located within the southern branch of the SEC (Lewis et al 2008). To augment the ∆ 14 C near Martinique by ~5‰ such as from 1835 to 1845, the SAW fraction might be reduced from 25% to 15%.…”
Section: Comparison Of R and ∆14c In Chancel 1 And In Corals And Sclesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Between 1835 and 1845, a reduced northward advection of the South Atlantic Waters, characterized by low SSS and low ∆ 14 C, towards the Martinique Island is inferred from the well-correlated increase of both δ 18 O and ∆ 14 C. Using modern estimates of the SAW fraction around the Lesser Antilles (Kirchner et al 2009) and values of ∆ 14 C in the South Atlantic (Lewis et al 2008) and subtropical North Atlantic (Goodkin et al, 2012), we calculated that the SAW fraction off Martinique Island was reduced from 25% to 15% from 1835 to 1845. Thus, although the sea surface ∆ 14 C compare well between the two decadal records in the western tropical North Atlantic, their variability indicates changes in ocean dynamics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We treated these features as known age, preatomic‐bomb specimens and included uncertainty of ±10–13 years to account for the age range of the historical artifacts recovered in the features. Similar approaches to determining Δ R using shellfish from known age historical features have been used by Lewis et al () for St. Helena Island in the South Atlantic and Thomas () for St. Catherine's Island, Georgia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both were based on single shells (Southon et al, 2002). Lewis et al (2008aLewis et al ( , 2008b predicted a significantly larger value of ∆R for the west coast of South Africa/Namibia for the period ad 1707 to 1834 (243 to 116 cal. BP), based on measurements of marine shells from St Helena Island.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%