2008
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291708003024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marital resemblance for obsessive–compulsive, anxious and depressive symptoms in a population-based sample

Abstract: Background. Resemblance between spouses can be due to phenotypic assortment, social homogamy and/or marital interaction. A significant degree of assortment can have consequences for the genetic architecture of a population. We examined the existence and cause(s) of assortment for obsessive-compulsive (OC), anxious and depressive symptoms in a population-based twin-family sample.Method. OC, anxious and depressive symptoms were measured in around 1400 twin-spouse pairs and >850 parent pairs. Correlations of twin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…33 Finally, the possibility of geneenvironment correlations should also be investigated because it is plausible that genetic factors could influence the specific environmental experiences of children who are vulnerable to developing OCD. 34 Nonbiological Relatives of Patients With OCD Are Also at Elevated Risk for OCD To our knowledge, an increased risk for clinically diagnosed OCD in spouses or partners sharing children with OCD probands has not been previously reported but is consistent with the results of a previous study 35 in a community-based sample of Dutch twins and their spouses. The present study design did not enable delineating possible marital interaction effects from assortative mating, or social homogamy.…”
Section: 30supporting
confidence: 89%
“…33 Finally, the possibility of geneenvironment correlations should also be investigated because it is plausible that genetic factors could influence the specific environmental experiences of children who are vulnerable to developing OCD. 34 Nonbiological Relatives of Patients With OCD Are Also at Elevated Risk for OCD To our knowledge, an increased risk for clinically diagnosed OCD in spouses or partners sharing children with OCD probands has not been previously reported but is consistent with the results of a previous study 35 in a community-based sample of Dutch twins and their spouses. The present study design did not enable delineating possible marital interaction effects from assortative mating, or social homogamy.…”
Section: 30supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The effect this would have on the genetic correlation of mating partners would depend on the proportion of shared genetic and environmental elements that cause the correlation between the phenotypes, and could be larger than under primary phenotypic assortment. This is not testable in the present data, but the observed r Sib1-P1 is already remarkably high compared to most other studied phenotypes (Maes et al 1998;van Grootheest et al 2008), and another study of assortative mating of antisocial behaviour found that antisocial acts were more strongly assorted for than were associated personality traits or attitudes (r behaviour = 0.53, r personality = 0.15) (Krueger et al 1998). Even if these processes were present, we believe it to be unlikely that the true genetic correlation is outside the range of values presented in Table 5.…”
Section: Assortative Matingcontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…36 Second, the use of twin models requires several assumptions, including the absence of assortative mating, the equal environment assumption, and the absence of geneYenvironment interaction and correlation. van Grootheest et al 37 found that small, but significant assortative mating existed for OC symptoms but concluded that the bias in twin studies caused by the small amount of assortment is negligible. Jonnal et al 18 tested the equal environment assumption for OC symptoms and concluded that the equal environment assumption was not violated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%