Maritime Raiding, International Law and the Suppression of Piracy on the South China Coast, 1842–1869

Abstract

This article explores how piracy was defined and eventually reduced in the South China seas between 1842-1869. In the early 1840s a large increase in maritime raiding led British agents to complain about the unwillingness of Qing officials to suppress disorder and drove the Hong Kong administration to propose its own solutions. British metropolitan officials nonetheless rejected many of these measures, arguing that they ran counter to established international maritime laws that made the Qing responsible for policing Chinese waters. Attempts were made to write this responsibility into the treaty which followed the Arrow War in 1860, but it was changes in the Qing state in the 1850s and 1860s which led Qing officials to treat small scale maritime raiding as seriously as that of large rebel pirate fleets. The new Imperial Maritime Customs Service created an incentive to prevent smuggling and piracy which could deter trade and hence decrease customs revenue. The case suggests, firstly, that the large reduction in maritime raiding rested on Sino-British compromise and, secondly, that Britain used international maritime laws as much to control the expansive ambitions of Hong Kong as to encourage changes in Qing practices. Acknowledgements This article was made possible by a United Kingdom Arts and Humanities Research Council Studentship, a Chiang Ching-kuo Foundation Doctoral Fellowship and a foreign scholars research grant from the Centre for Chinese Studies in Taipei. I am grateful to Robert Bickers for reading and commenting on drafts. I am also indebted to I

European colonisation, law, and Indigenous marine dispossession: historical perspectives on the construction and entrenchment of unequal marine governance

“…This was achieved through colonial-dominated suppression regimes surrounding piracy and slavery, which were reliant on a series of bilateral agreements with Indigenous authorities that provided European naval forces with the jurisdiction to stop, seize, and suppress Indigenous shipping. This also justified assaults on coastal outposts on the grounds of piracy or slavery (Benton 2011b;Benton and Ford 2016;Chappell 2018;Kwan 2020b;Steinberg 2001;Sicking 2018;Pitts 2018). To focus on slavery, the British pursued a series of bilateral treaties with European and non-European powers following the abolition of the British slave trade in 1807.…”

‘Putting down a common enemy’: Piracy and occasional interstate power in South China during the mid-nineteenth century

“…30 After the Treaty of Nanking, with a colony at Hong Kong and five treaty ports along the coast of China open to foreign trade and residence, the British state now had an interest in suppressing Chinese piracy. 31 The criminal justice system in Hong Kong, however, lacked the capacity to deal with pirates. Even 16 years after the British flag was raised over the colony, the governor complained that 'the whole administration of Criminal Justice in cases connected with Piracy is so defective from the difficulties attending interpretation in various dialects, keeping the witnesses in attendance and various other causes'.…”