Complex Social and Behavioral Systems 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0368-0_655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Market Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kojima et al [28] explained preferences by stating that each college's preference for selecting students is "responsive," meaning that each college has its own preferences and standards, so when selecting students, they prioritize based on the student's qualifcations. In this study, we also assume that if the following formula holds true, then the preference of the rehabilitation bus for patient selection, denoted by ≻ s , is also "responsive":…”
Section: Modeling Framework and Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kojima et al [28] explained preferences by stating that each college's preference for selecting students is "responsive," meaning that each college has its own preferences and standards, so when selecting students, they prioritize based on the student's qualifcations. In this study, we also assume that if the following formula holds true, then the preference of the rehabilitation bus for patient selection, denoted by ≻ s , is also "responsive":…”
Section: Modeling Framework and Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kojima et al [28] believe that a stable match μ is Paretoefcient and envy-free, while Roth [48] believes that in some cases, the deferred acceptance algorithm cannot satisfy both stability and Pareto efciency. In addition, Roth [25] mentioned that if the students make the application, there will be optimal and stable results for the students.…”
Section: Modeling Framework and Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation