2016
DOI: 10.1080/09571264.2016.1144584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Market opportunity recognition in the Chilean wine industry: traditional versus relational marketing approaches

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to examine how wine firms implement their marketing strategies based on the recognition of market opportunities by their Chief Executive Officers (CEO). Firstly, we describe the marketing activities in 69 traditional Chilean wine firms. Then, we had in-depth interviews with CEOs of two wineries which were analysed using cognitive maps to uncover the cognitive process responsible for recognizing and executing market activities. Our findings indicate there is similar set of strategic res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of management capabilities and their connection with strategy and performance has been analyzed finding a positive relation (Spanos and Lioukas, 2001;Ortega, 2010;Welter et al, 2013). In the wine industry and wineries in the New World, management capabilities have also been related to better performance: in the Chilean wine industry, in the choice of strategies based on changes in the environment (Torres and Kunc, 2016), and in wineries of the Napa Valley in California, in which managerial skills are preeminent to adapt strategies to changes in the competitive environment (Taplin, 2006). Thus, this relates to the establishment of the third (C) hypothesis:…”
Section: Management Capabilities and Business Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis of management capabilities and their connection with strategy and performance has been analyzed finding a positive relation (Spanos and Lioukas, 2001;Ortega, 2010;Welter et al, 2013). In the wine industry and wineries in the New World, management capabilities have also been related to better performance: in the Chilean wine industry, in the choice of strategies based on changes in the environment (Torres and Kunc, 2016), and in wineries of the Napa Valley in California, in which managerial skills are preeminent to adapt strategies to changes in the competitive environment (Taplin, 2006). Thus, this relates to the establishment of the third (C) hypothesis:…”
Section: Management Capabilities and Business Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The achievement of a competitive advantage means the creation of greater value for the winery, which is reflected in better performance indicators (Amadieu and Viviani, 2010;Simon-Elorz et al, 2015). At the same time and in terms of internal resources and capabilities to obtain this competitive advantage, management capabilities are also studied, with research that analyzes this internal capital to be the most important in determining the best results of companies in various business sectors (Teece et al, 1997 Spanos and Lioukas, 2001;Ortega, 2010), and the wine sector (Remaud and Couderc, 2006;Kunc, 2007;Torres and Kunc, 2016). This article comes to cover gaps in knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its representation and analysis of MMDS keep the advantages of representing models as directed graphs (Langan‐Fox et al, ) and extends the comparison methods for dealing with feedback loops (Schaffernicht & Groesser, , ). However, only a minority of studies have taken loops into account for mental model comparison (Inam, Adamowski, Halbe, & Prasher, ; Kunc, ; Lane, ; Torres & Kunc, ; Torres, Kunc, & O'Brien, ).…”
Section: Mental Models In Different Strands Of Management Research LImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Margin column shows the marginal effect of each variable. The importance of market segmentation is that it allows a business to conserve money by targeting consumers with specific needs and wants for a particular product (Govindasamy et al 2018;Lichtenstein et al 1997;Hofstede et al 1999;Antreas, 2000;Bruwer & Li, 2007;Torres & Kunc, 2016). Interpreting the regression output begins with an assessment of the first variable "State" which provides the location where the respondent resides: New Jersey (NJ), New York (NY), or Pennsylvania (PA).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%