“…First, note that by (24), (25) and (26), for x in the range [p, R 3 ), each of ψ 1 (x), ψ 2 (x) and ψ 3 (x) equals F (x) times a constant factor (i.e., a factor that does not depend on x), and hence they differ only by a constant multiplicative factor. This is similar to the NE strategies in Theorem 1 (with n = 3), for which, by (6) and the fact that ϕ i (x) = q i ψ i (x), each of ψ 1 (x), ψ 2 (x) and ψ 3 (x) equals ϕ(x) times a constant factor on x ∈ [p, R 3 ).…”