2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2483-7_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markov Decision Processes to Model Livestock Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Livestock systems are considered complex and subject to considerable variation, cyclic behavior, and a finite supply of animals (Nielsen and Kristensen, 2015;Jaurena and Cantet, 2016).…”
Section: Modelling Farm Resources Herd Dynamics and Animal Footprintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Livestock systems are considered complex and subject to considerable variation, cyclic behavior, and a finite supply of animals (Nielsen and Kristensen, 2015;Jaurena and Cantet, 2016).…”
Section: Modelling Farm Resources Herd Dynamics and Animal Footprintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the model deals with a limited number of possible alternatives, it illustrates the most noticeable trade-offs (de Souza Filho et al, 2019), trends, and expectations despite avoiding a larger number of spatial and temporal dimensions. Caballero et al (2009) and Nielsen and Kristensen (2015) pointed out that sophisticated models require very large amounts of data and demand the estimation of numerous parameters. This further suggests that relatively parsimonious models such as the present one may generally be easier to use, adapt and understand when applied to relatively constrained environmental situations.…”
Section: Modelling Farm Resources Herd Dynamics and Animal Footprintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hierarchical MDPs (HMDPs) [10] are a special case of BMDPs where there are no cycles in the offspring graph (equivalently, no cyclic dependency between types). BMDPs and HMDPs have found applications in manpower planning [29], controlled queuing networks [2,15], management of livestock [20], and epidemic control [1,25], among others. The focus of these works was on optimising the expected average, or the discounted reward over a run of the process, or optimising the population growth rate.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, many studies have attempted to investigate and subsequently optimize the replacement decisions of individual cows for better economic gains (reviews by De Vries and Marcondes, 2020; Lehenbauer and Oltjen, 1998;Nielsen and Kristensen, 2015). Van Arendonk (1984) identified two approaches in 1960s and 1970s to optimize replacement decisions mathematically, namely, Marginal Net Revenue (MNR) approach and Dynamic Programming (DP) approach.…”
Section: Optimal Culling and Replacement Of Dairy Cowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, models by , DeLorenzo et al (1992), and Cabrera (2010) were developed as tools for making optimal replacement decisions, whereas replacement decision models by Bar et al (2008), and Demeter et al (2011) were developed to study the cost of clinical mastitis and economic impact of breeding policies on dairy farms respectively. Nielsen and Kristensen (2015) gave detailed comments on the two applications of the decision optimizers as decision support tools and as research models.…”
Section: Optimal Culling and Replacement Of Dairy Cowsmentioning
confidence: 99%