2014
DOI: 10.1002/mana.201300277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markovian extensions of symmetric second order elliptic differential operators

Abstract: Key words Self-adjoint extensions, Markovian operators, elliptic differential operators MSC (2010) Primary, 47B25, Secondary, 47B38, 35J25Let ⊂ R n be bounded with a smooth boundary and let S be the symmetric operator in L 2 ( ) given by the minimal realization of a second order elliptic differential operator. We give a complete classification of the Markovian self-adjoint extensions of S by providing an explicit one-to-one correspondence between such extensions and the class of Dirichlet forms in L 2 ( ) whic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present paper is a continuation of this theme building up on the results in [GHK + 15,KLSW17] and presenting further confirmation for this point of view. More specifically, our main result provides an analogue to the result of Posilicano [Pos14] mentioned above and provides a one-to-one correspondence of the Dirichlet forms on a graph and the Dirichlet forms on the Royden boundary.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present paper is a continuation of this theme building up on the results in [GHK + 15,KLSW17] and presenting further confirmation for this point of view. More specifically, our main result provides an analogue to the result of Posilicano [Pos14] mentioned above and provides a one-to-one correspondence of the Dirichlet forms on a graph and the Dirichlet forms on the Royden boundary.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In this context is it worth emphasizing that our approach is quite different from the one taken in [Pos14]. Indeed, right from the outset our situation is different as there is no geometrical boundary available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here a ∧ b := min{a, b} and a ∨ b := max{a, b}. Then, proceeding as in the linear case considered in [28], by γ 0 (f ∧ g) = γ 0 f ∧ γ 0 g and γ 0 (f ∨ g) = γ 0 f ∨ γ 0 g, one can check that…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, there is a long series of different but complementary results on Wentzell-type boundary conditions in the theory of Dirichlet forms, see e.g. [43] for an updated series of references.…”
Section: ∂ ) (Again (12) Is Obtained Taking the Trace Of The Firstmentioning
confidence: 99%