2011
DOI: 10.1080/07418825.2011.641577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marriage and Involvement in Crime: A Consideration of Reciprocal Effects in a Nationally Representative Sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For marital status, the percentages of offenders who are married or in a common-law relationship are substantially lower than those offenders who are single. This finding could be explained by the financial and social support and stability among couples and increased conformity when compared to single persons, which decreases the likelihood of offending [75]. The OLS regression results indicate that these individual variables exhibit different statistical relationships with different types of crime.…”
Section: Discussion Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For marital status, the percentages of offenders who are married or in a common-law relationship are substantially lower than those offenders who are single. This finding could be explained by the financial and social support and stability among couples and increased conformity when compared to single persons, which decreases the likelihood of offending [75]. The OLS regression results indicate that these individual variables exhibit different statistical relationships with different types of crime.…”
Section: Discussion Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Because second-generation immigrants have a higher base rate of offending compared with their first-generation peers, the larger marriage effect may be a function of the second generation having more criminal behavior from which to desist. Further, despite controlling for a number of factors that may influence one's propensity to offend and to marry, and using an analytic strategy that models within-individual change, the findings presented here may be influenced by selection bias; that is, individuals who are more likely to reduce their offending are also selectively more likely to marry (see, e.g., Barnes et al 2014;King and South 2011). 5 Sampson and Laub (1993) argue that marital quality is a key distinguishing feature leading to the growth of social bonds and subsequently, desistance from crime.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a male to accumulate a relatively high number of sexual partners in a short time suggests competition—fighting and wrangling with other men—although the same outcome could be achieved with little to no violence. Further, a growing body of research suggests that, rather than marriage and monogamous unions affecting violence, the relationship may also work the other way around, with crime and antisocial behavior affecting union formation and stability (Barnes et al, 2014; Bersani and Doherty, 2013; Lyngstad and Skardhamar, 2013). Unfortunately, detailed information on specific relationships was limited to a small sample of sexual partners, making it difficult to discern why some of the men became monogamous while others did not.…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%