1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf01796798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marriage risks, cohabitation and premarital births in Canada

Abstract: "This paper is an attempt to examine the trends in union formation among various cohorts and to identify some of the socio-demographic correlates of marital timing. The data for this study are taken from the Canadian Fertility Survey of 1984. The results indicate that there is no immediate crisis for the family in Canada, but that many are choosing cohabitation as a preferred mode of first union formation at early stages. Young women (below 25 years of age), residents of large metropolitan areas, those with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Respondents born in the 1930s and 40s were between 62 and 81 years old at the time of the survey, and only individuals who survived to this age could be sampled. The median survival time to first marriage for these birth cohorts found in this study corresponds closely with past studies of these cohorts (e.g., Pollard and Wu 1998;Rao 1990;Ravanera et al 2002), so it appears that the mortality bias is not a large concern.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Respondents born in the 1930s and 40s were between 62 and 81 years old at the time of the survey, and only individuals who survived to this age could be sampled. The median survival time to first marriage for these birth cohorts found in this study corresponds closely with past studies of these cohorts (e.g., Pollard and Wu 1998;Rao 1990;Ravanera et al 2002), so it appears that the mortality bias is not a large concern.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, it is not without its limitations. One limitation is that it excludes other determinants of type of first union choice and timing of first union that have been shown to be important in past research, including the conception, birth, and presence of children, income, and work status (e.g., Eggebeen and Dew 2009; Kerr et al 2006;Rao 1990). The 2011 GSS includes retrospective information about fertility and work histories, so future work could include these measures to further the results of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Its growing prevalence is, in part, a phase in the ongoing social transformation of the Western family, preceded by declining marriage and fertility rates, postponement of marriage, and increasing divorce rates. Cohabitation may in fact be a reaction to the declining marital rates and rising divorce rates, and the sense that marriage is an increasingly fragile union Thornton 1992, 1996;Lillard, Brien, and Waite 1995;Rao 1988). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%