2014 IEEE Aerospace Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2014.6836421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mars Sample Return using commercial capabilities: Mission architecture overview

Abstract: Abstract-Mars Sample Return (MSR) is the highest priority science mission for the next decade as recommended by the recent Decadal Survey of Planetary Science. This paper presents an overview of a feasibility study for a MSR mission.The objective of the study was to determine whether emerging commercial capabilities can be used to reduce the number of mission systems and launches required to return the samples, with the goal of reducing mission cost. The major element required for the MSR mission are described… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study described in this article was conducted in 2013 [13] by a team of engineers at NASA's Ames Research Center (see acknowledgements), led by the co-authors of this report. Only publicly available information on the properties of SpaceX hardware such as the Falcon Heavy and the Dragon capsule were used.…”
Section: Study Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study described in this article was conducted in 2013 [13] by a team of engineers at NASA's Ames Research Center (see acknowledgements), led by the co-authors of this report. Only publicly available information on the properties of SpaceX hardware such as the Falcon Heavy and the Dragon capsule were used.…”
Section: Study Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Compared with the parabolic nose with k = 0:75, the zero-attack-angle CA of the exponential nose (n = 0:2) decreases by about 19.8% to 0.933 at Ma2.0 and drops by about 14.0% to 0.918 at Ma4.1, with evident drag reduction (4) The exponential nose with n = 0:4 is close to that with n = 0:2 in the supersonic drag reduction. It can be inferred that, when n = 0:2 -0:4, the aerodynamic performance of the exponential nose still requires optimization (5) The static stability margin of the exponential nose is less than that of the parabolic nose. The minimum pressure center coefficient of the exponential nose with n = 0:2 is 0.6 so that it is difficult to maintain static stability…”
Section: Influence Analysis Of Aerodynamic Performance Of Forebody Co...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance with the published literature, countries all over the world mainly adopt two routes for the shape design of Mars ascent vehicles. One is the slender body similar to the missile/rocket [2][3][4], and the other is the short blunt body with a high loading volume ratio [5,6]. The former is mainly developed for the solid propulsion system, while the latter is mainly developed for the liquid propulsion system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the success of these methods, they are not suited to applications in which ground communication is limited or delayed, and often very expensive to implement . For these reasons, the development of fully autonomous rendezvous techniques has been identified as a key challenge for current and future formation flying missions (e.g., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%