2020
DOI: 10.25226/bboc.v140i3.2020.a3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Martinet's engravings in Buffon (1770–83): variation in their hand-colouring and its implications for defining Echo Parakeet Psittacula eques (Boddaert, 1783)

Abstract: BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there was just one original artistic representation of the unique but now lost specimen from Réunion (Cheke & Hume 2008, Cheke & Jansen 2016, by François-Nicolas Martinet, each copy of the work in which his drawing appeared (Daubenton 1770-83) had to be coloured separately. Jansen & Cheke (2020) determined, via analysis of five different copies of Buffon's work, that the presumably different colourists responsible, none of whom presumably had access to the specimen, introduced differences in the colour of the irides, bill and peri-ocular ring, the colour and pattern of the underparts, the shape and colour of the neck-ring, and the precise colour of the wings. None of the plates examined by Jansen & Cheke (2020) precisely matched the detailed description that Brisson (1760) made of the same specimen which served as Martinet's basis for the original illustration.…”
Section: Historical Artwork For Species Delimitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there was just one original artistic representation of the unique but now lost specimen from Réunion (Cheke & Hume 2008, Cheke & Jansen 2016, by François-Nicolas Martinet, each copy of the work in which his drawing appeared (Daubenton 1770-83) had to be coloured separately. Jansen & Cheke (2020) determined, via analysis of five different copies of Buffon's work, that the presumably different colourists responsible, none of whom presumably had access to the specimen, introduced differences in the colour of the irides, bill and peri-ocular ring, the colour and pattern of the underparts, the shape and colour of the neck-ring, and the precise colour of the wings. None of the plates examined by Jansen & Cheke (2020) precisely matched the detailed description that Brisson (1760) made of the same specimen which served as Martinet's basis for the original illustration.…”
Section: Historical Artwork For Species Delimitationmentioning
confidence: 99%