1999
DOI: 10.3998/mpub.11004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marx Went Away--But Karl Stayed Behind

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Kin is the main operative ideology of intracultural relationships for the majority of world cultures (Morgan 2000;Engels 1985;Schneider 1984;Needham 1971;Collier and Yanagiasko 1987;Faubion 1996;Goody 1990). Kin as a major source of household labor and exchange of goods is nothing new to Sakha or other cultures across the world (Netting 1993;Humphrey 1998;Wilk 1999). What makes kin relations for the Sakha interesting and compelling is understanding the extent to which kin networks have functioned as such over time and the extent to which they are being rediscovered and utilized anew after a long period of political oppression and economic abundance and stability.…”
Section: Kinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kin is the main operative ideology of intracultural relationships for the majority of world cultures (Morgan 2000;Engels 1985;Schneider 1984;Needham 1971;Collier and Yanagiasko 1987;Faubion 1996;Goody 1990). Kin as a major source of household labor and exchange of goods is nothing new to Sakha or other cultures across the world (Netting 1993;Humphrey 1998;Wilk 1999). What makes kin relations for the Sakha interesting and compelling is understanding the extent to which kin networks have functioned as such over time and the extent to which they are being rediscovered and utilized anew after a long period of political oppression and economic abundance and stability.…”
Section: Kinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patterns of inclusion and disenfranchisement differ widely between regions and even from village to village. In rural Buryatia (Humphrey 1997 and1999b), collectives remain almost everywhere and in each village around 30-40% of the people have been excluded from membership though not physically evicted. Heated, noisy meetings are held to decide the fate of the farm (its legal status, its charter, whether it should disband, etc.).…”
Section: Yet Recent Field Research In Russia Indicates That the Legitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exile to remote regions (ssylka) consisted of being inserted into the designated local society at the very lowest, most deprived level (see, for example, Amalrik's description (1970) of his exile to a collective farm in Siberia). As I discovered in farms in Buryatia at the 1960s-70s (Humphrey 1999b), any village would contain a number of such people, detailed to perform the most unpleasant and badly-paid tasks. One could not find any particular 'categorical distinctions' (Tilly 1998) at work.…”
Section: Expulsion and Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research analyzing post-Soviet indigenous survival shows that native inhabitants of Russia have adapted to the conditions of the transition by reinstating some level of pre-Soviet subsistence strategies (Fondahl, 1998;Humphrey, 1998;Golovnev and Osherenko, 1999;Kerttula, 2000;Ziker, 2002;Crate, 2003a, b;Crate and Nuttall, 2004). The research described here shows that Viliui Sakha are not lacking in creative ideas on how to build sustainable futures for their communities and future generations.…”
Section: Indigenous Sustainability In the Post-socialist Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%