Marxist Perspectives on the Global Enclosures of Social Reproduction

Abstract

Women's unpaid care and domestic work is gaining relevance in policy-making as well as in academia. Feminist scholars and activists have lobbied successfully for the integration of unpaid care and domestic work into the Sustainable Development Goals (Goal 5.4) of the United Nations in the hope for greater recognition of women's contribution to the economy. Policy documents about social reproduction highlight women's disproportionate share of reproductive activities as an obstacle to women's economic empowerment and as a relic of 'traditional' gender roles. Social reproduction is thereby not understood as a merit in itself, but as an obstacle to women's participation in paid labour. Policy implications will enable certain empowerment effects for some women, but at the same time promote the increasing privatization and commodification of reproductive work across the globe. Rising inequalities between the Global North and South and between women along the categories of class and race will be one major result. To theoretically explain such contradictory effects of the recognition of social reproduction, I use the concept of 'enclosures' based on Marx' 'primitive accumulation'. Feminist scholars use the concept to explain how unpaid care and housework is commodified or de-commodified to integrate women into the paid labour force or to reduce the costs of social reproduction according to the needs of the economy. The sudden interest in unpaid care and domestic work e.g. in the Sustainable Development Goals can therefore be seen as process of double enclosure, which integrates women into the paid labour force, but also sets the grounds for the further commodification of domestic and care work. This paper aims to critically discuss the sudden interest in unpaid domestic and care work and its contradictory effects from a Marxist feminist perspective and reflects on feminist strategies and movements in global governance. After introducing Marxist perspectives on social reproduction, the question if and how feminist ideas and concepts have been appropriated, the effects and implications of global policies on social reproduction and global inequalities, as well as possible counter-strategies will be discussed. Acknowledgement: I want to thank Karin, my mother, who did all the reproductive work during her Christmas holidays while I was working on this article. I also want to thank my dear friends Deborah Sielert, Moritz Altenried, Bernardo Bianchi, Frank Engster and Martin Fries for their useful and encouraging comments, as well as Sarah Hönig and Dominik Arncken for their linguistic and other support. Special thanks go to Tove Soiland, who not only provided useful comments, but also inspired the entire article with her work and seminars on feminist perspectives on the concept of Landnahme (enclosure).

Toward a Decolonial Feminist Anticapitalism: María Lugones, Sylvia Wynter, and Sayak Valencia

“…11 Part of what Valencia traces here is the way in Hypatia which for much of the world, direct violence is not a mode of "primitive accumulation" 12 consigned to the past, but is constitutive of capitalism itself. This is rather different from much of the contemporary theorization of "ongoing primitive accumulation," in which direct means of coercion form the condition for the possibility of capital's valorization (Federici 2012a;Soiland 2016;Beier 2018). In these approaches, forms of direct violence continue in order to secure women's (especially racialized women's) specific vulnerability on the capitalist wage market and to maintain the extraction of women's unpaid social reproduction work in the home.…”

Depoliticising Gender Equality in Turbulent Times: The Case of the European Gender Action Plan for External Relations

“…The trajectories between gender, race and class, which build the structural dimensions of intersectional inequalities (Yuval-Davis, 2006), are therefore neglected, although they have contributed to the economic crisis in the first place (Fukuda-Parr et al, 2013). Translating intersectional equality claims into policies without recognising the primary causes and interlinkages between gender, race and class is thereby prone to further entrench inequalities instead of reducing them (Beier, 2018).…”