Máscara laríngea I-Gel® versus bolsa-válvula-mascarilla en la reanimación cardiopulmonar instrumental bajo monitorización capnográfica: ensayo clínico piloto aleatorizado por grupos

Airway management in cardiac arrest and outcomes. Author’s reply

“…Exclusion criteria: < 18 years old, predicted difficult intubation Vie-Scope vs. Macintosh laryngoscope 3 EM services 90 (45 Vie-Scope, 45 Macintosh) The primary outcome was ETI success rate during first laryngoscopy attempt. Secondary outcomes included the duration of the interruption of chest compression during ETI, Laryngeal view during intubation using Cormack-Lehane grade system, and self-reported percentage of glottis opening score Macintosh required longer time for ETI than Vie-Scope, and less first attempt success rate Cereceda-Sánchez et al [ 9 ] RCT, pilot Inclusion criteria: adults ≥ 18, years or older with OHCA who received resuscitation performed by clinicians from participating centers. Exclusion criteria: advanced airways, weight > 50 kg, oral cavity < 2 cm BMV vs. i-Gel 4 EM services 23 (9 BMV, 14 i-Gel) Comparison between BMV and i-Gel on capnometry and survival i-Gel group survived more than BMV group Chan et al [ 10 ] RCT, cluster, cross-over Inclusion criteria: all patients with OHCAs aged over 13 years, both medical and traumatic.…”