2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2005.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Masking-based β-order MMSE speech enhancement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the estimation of the relative threshold offsets obtained using (18) and/or (20) are also affected. This is because the residual noise of the preliminary estimated speech may severely change the original tonality of the speech signal [19]. As a result of the inaccurate relative threshold offset, the estimation error of the noise masking threshold increases.…”
Section: Modified Relative Threshold Offset and Noise-masking Threshomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the estimation of the relative threshold offsets obtained using (18) and/or (20) are also affected. This is because the residual noise of the preliminary estimated speech may severely change the original tonality of the speech signal [19]. As a result of the inaccurate relative threshold offset, the estimation error of the noise masking threshold increases.…”
Section: Modified Relative Threshold Offset and Noise-masking Threshomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, if the difference between the two is larger than the back-fitting threshold value, then the KBF process of step 6 is iterated until convergence. Applying the auxiliary function approach [20] to a quadrature form of the spectrogram gradients, the back-fitting threshold value is calculated at each iteration.…”
Section: ) Determination Of Music/voice Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In single-channel speech enhancement methods based on WbE, the cost function includes both a power law β and a weighting factor α. To obtain a significant noise reduction and an improved speech estimation of weak speech components both in terms of objective and subjective measures, adaptive calculation methods of parameters α and β, of the cost function, have been proposed and published in the literature [19]- [21].…”
Section: Appropriate Calculation Of β J and α Jmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical speech enhancement system [7,10,14,15,21,22,78,79,80] that exploits masking properties is described in Fig. 2.6.…”
Section: The Speech Receiver Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 shows an example of the IS curves and the average IS value for a noisy speech signal.The frame length was set to 240 samples with an overlap of 180 samples and a sampling rate of 8kHz. In practice, the IS distortion is obtained by averaging the smallest 85% ∼ 95% of IS values over all the frames of the speech signal under examination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%