2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2006.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass spectrometric analysis and aerodynamic properties of various types of combustion-related aerosol particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

46
232
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 285 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
46
232
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 summarizes our findings and respective conditions. When combined with the findings of other reports Schneider et al 2006), a sufficient body of experimental evidence exists to warrant caution when using silicone tubing for aerosol sampling and characterization experiments, especially since standard testing procedures may not reveal the contamination.…”
Section: Sampling Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1 summarizes our findings and respective conditions. When combined with the findings of other reports Schneider et al 2006), a sufficient body of experimental evidence exists to warrant caution when using silicone tubing for aerosol sampling and characterization experiments, especially since standard testing procedures may not reveal the contamination.…”
Section: Sampling Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Since the fuel rich flames produced soot particles whereas the oxygen rich flames did not, the authors infer that the PDMS contaminant partitions preferentially onto soot. Schneider et al (2006) also report PDMS contamination of soot particles produced by a spark soot generator. Yu et al (2009) report siloxane uptake onto NaNO 3 particles (83 nm geometric mean diameter).…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Siloxane Uptakementioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the first on-line mass spectrometric analysis of single particles in 1973 (Davis, 1973), many researchers have focused on the emission factors of different sources including gasoline and diesel engine (Oudejans et al, 2004;Toner et al, 2006), wood burning (Schneider et al, 2006) and cigarette smoke (Dall'Osto et al, 2007) etc., whereas relatively little has been carried out on the characterization of coal soot with an aerosol mass spectrometer. This paper presents on-line analyses of the coal soot produced at different combustion/pyrolysis times and temperatures with a newly home-built vacuum ultraviolet photoionization aerosol time of flight mass spectrometer (VUV-ATOFMS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%