2000
DOI: 10.1081/ss-100100233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass Transfer and Zeta Potential in Solvent Extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the contaminant levels and their types are not fixed and may vary during the operation. The presence of contaminants in mass-transfer systems is known to reduce the mass-transfer coefficient markedly by exerting an excess mass-transfer resistance and has been studied by many investigators. The role of electrostatic potential and the influence of electrolytes on the reduction of the mass-transfer rate in liquid−liquid systems have been investigated by a number of investigators. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the contaminant levels and their types are not fixed and may vary during the operation. The presence of contaminants in mass-transfer systems is known to reduce the mass-transfer coefficient markedly by exerting an excess mass-transfer resistance and has been studied by many investigators. The role of electrostatic potential and the influence of electrolytes on the reduction of the mass-transfer rate in liquid−liquid systems have been investigated by a number of investigators. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of electrostatic potential, particularly in the presence of ionic surfactants, on the mass transfer and the influence of electrolytes on the reduction of mass-transfer rate between two liquid-liquid systems have been investigated by many authors. [20][21][22][23] The excess mass-transfer resistance exerted by the surface-active agents has been attributed to the hydrodynamic effect and/or to the formation of an interfacial barrier layer. The effects of surface-active agents on the hydrodynamic behavior of a moving drop may arise from (1) changes in the internal circulation velocities within the drops, (2) interfacial mobilization, and (3) the inhibition of interfacial movement due to the gradient of interfacial tension along the drop interfacial area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ionic surfactants load the interface and change the interfacial concentration of the extractable aqueous species, thus having an effect on the mass transfer of ionic species. The role of electrostatic potential, particularly in the presence of ionic surfactants, on the mass transfer and the influence of electrolytes on the reduction of mass-transfer rate between two liquid−liquid systems have been investigated by many authors. The excess mass-transfer resistance exerted by the surface-active agents has been attributed to the hydrodynamic effect and/or to the formation of an interfacial barrier layer. The effects of surface-active agents on the hydrodynamic behavior of a moving drop may arise from (1) changes in the internal circulation velocities within the drops, (2) interfacial mobilization, and (3) the inhibition of interfacial movement due to the gradient of interfacial tension along the drop interfacial area. ,, In addition, the barrier-layer effect, also called the physicochemical effect, has been attributed to the interaction between solute and adsorbed surface-active agents across the interface. ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%