1995
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.52.4668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Massive renormalizable Abelian gauge theory in 2+1 dimensions

Abstract: The standard formulation of a massive Abelian vector field in 2 + 1 dimensions involves a Maxwell kinetic term plus a Chern-Simons mass term; in its place we consider a Chern-Simons kinetic term plus a Stueckelberg mass term. In this latter model, we still have a massive vector field, but now the interaction with a charged spinor field is renormalizable (as opposed to superrenormalizable). By choosing an appropriate gauge-fixing term, the Stueckelberg auxiliary scalar field decouples from the vector field. The… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It would therefore be of interest to examine an alternative regularization scheme that preserves gauge invariance without the need to dimensionally continue the antisymmetric tensor. One excellent candidate is operator regularization, which was shown to greatly facilitate two-loop calculations in Chern-Simons theory [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would therefore be of interest to examine an alternative regularization scheme that preserves gauge invariance without the need to dimensionally continue the antisymmetric tensor. One excellent candidate is operator regularization, which was shown to greatly facilitate two-loop calculations in Chern-Simons theory [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as follows from [2], [6] and [7]. Since K 0 (x) ∼ − log x and K 1 (x) ∼ 1 x near x = 0, we see that the energy…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Setting β = 0 in order to ensure that A 0 (r) vanishes at infinity, we see from [6] and [4b] that A(r) = −αr K 1 (µr) .…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations