2017
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Massive star formation by accretion

Abstract: Context. Massive stars likely form by accretion and the evolutionary track of an accreting forming star corresponds to what is called the birthline in the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram. The shape of this birthline is quite sensitive to the evolution of the entropy in the accreting star. Aims. We first study the reasons why some birthlines published in past years present different behaviours for a given accretion rate. We then revisit the question of the accretion rate, which allows us to understand the dist… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It strongly impacts the nature of the ionizing flux released in the cavity that is normal to the disc plane (see also discussion Section 5). The proper timescale of this phenomenon is difficult to predict without self-consistent stellar evolution calculations, which time-dependently account for the physics of accretion, such as the GENEC (Haemmerlé 2014;Haemmerlé et al 2016Haemmerlé et al , 2017 or the STELLAR (Yorke & Kruegel 1977;Hosokawa & Omukai 2009;Hosokawa et al 2010) codes. Only then the structure and upper layer thermodynamics of the MYSOs can be calculated.…”
Section: Bursts Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It strongly impacts the nature of the ionizing flux released in the cavity that is normal to the disc plane (see also discussion Section 5). The proper timescale of this phenomenon is difficult to predict without self-consistent stellar evolution calculations, which time-dependently account for the physics of accretion, such as the GENEC (Haemmerlé 2014;Haemmerlé et al 2016Haemmerlé et al , 2017 or the STELLAR (Yorke & Kruegel 1977;Hosokawa & Omukai 2009;Hosokawa et al 2010) codes. Only then the structure and upper layer thermodynamics of the MYSOs can be calculated.…”
Section: Bursts Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More massive objects might form at higher rates during the main accretion phase, before the rate declines. Many reasons might explain the decrease in the accretion rate as a function of the mass of the accretor, such as the effect of the rising UV feedback (Peters et al 2010c) as the stellar surface heats up, the increase of radiation pressure (Kuiper et al 2010b), or the angular momentum barrier (Haemmerlé et al 2017).…”
Section: Constraints On Accretion History From Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general description of the code with rotation, without accretion, can be found in Eggenberger et al (2008). The treatment of accretion is detailed in Haemmerlé et al (2016Haemmerlé et al ( , 2017a. …”
Section: Stellar Evolution Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical velocity v crit,1 , which corresponds to the Keplerian velocity at the stellar surface, is the maximum rotational velocity a star can reach in hydrostatic equilibrium. For massive Population I (Pop I) stars, the critical limit constrains the accreted angular momentum to be less than 1/3 of the Keplerian angular momentum (Haemmerlé et al 2017a). If it exceeds this value, internal angular momentum redistribution by convection leads the stellar surface to rotate above the critical limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%