2020
DOI: 10.3390/galaxies8010013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Massive Star Formation in the Ultraviolet Observed with the Hubble Space Telescope

Abstract: Spectroscopic observations of a massive star formation in the ultraviolet and their interpretation are reviewed. After a brief historical retrospective, two well-studied resolved star clusters and the surrounding H II regions are introduced: NGC 2070 in the Large Magellanic Cloud and NGC 604 in M33. These regions serve as a training set for studies of more distant clusters, which can no longer be resolved into individual stars. Observations of recently formed star clusters and extended regions in star-forming … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We also do not detect any other rest-frame UV metal lines (e.g. O iii]λλ1661,1666, N iv]λλ1483,1487, N vλ1240), inconsistent with the signatures of Wolf-Rayet and stripped stars that are frequently seen in local galaxies 31,32 .…”
contrasting
confidence: 77%
“…We also do not detect any other rest-frame UV metal lines (e.g. O iii]λλ1661,1666, N iv]λλ1483,1487, N vλ1240), inconsistent with the signatures of Wolf-Rayet and stripped stars that are frequently seen in local galaxies 31,32 .…”
contrasting
confidence: 77%
“…However, their He II EWs are reported to be less than 10 Å, not as high as that measured in our galaxy, and their He II emission is likely caused by stellar binarity and density-bounded H II regions with subsolar ISM metallicities (Plat et al 2019). We do not detect any UV metal lines (e.g., C III], C IV, O III], N IV] λλ1483, 1487, N V λ1240) either, inconsistent with the signatures of W-R and stripped stars that are often seen in local galaxies (Morris et al 2008;Leitherer 2020), although we caution that the strength of these wind lines for W-R and stripped stars is metallicity-dependent and is likely to be very weak at extremely low metallicities (e.g., much lower than onetenth solar).…”
contrasting
confidence: 66%
“…One of them involves the suggestion of stellar emission from VMS at low Z due to a strong but slow wind (see Figure 4). Gräfener & Vink [39] estimated the expected He II line flux and equivalent widths (EWs) based on their VMS wind models and Starburst99 [40,41] population synthesis models, and compared their results with observed star-forming galaxy spectra, finding that the measured He II line strengths and EWs are in line with what is expected for a VMS population in one or more young clusters located in these galaxies. Future high spectral resolution studies could help distinguish between nebular and stellar emission from VMS, taking into account that slower VMS winds yield narrower lines, possibly even below the slow-wind predictions from Gräfener & Vink [39].…”
Section: He II Emission At High Redshiftmentioning
confidence: 94%