2021
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c08796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Massively Parallelized Molecular Force Manipulation with On-Demand Thermal and Optical Control

Abstract: In single-molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS), a tethered molecule is stretched using a specialized instrument to study how macromolecules extend under force. One problem in SMFS is the serial and slow nature of the measurements, performed one molecule at a time. To address this long-standing challenge, we report on the origami polymer force clamp (OPFC) which enables parallelized manipulation of the mechanical forces experienced by molecules without the need for dedicated SMFS instruments or surface tethering.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The treated cells showed ∼50% less spread area and ∼80% less tension signal compared to untreated cells. This confirms that the reported tension is reversible and mediated by F-actin and myosin activity in alignment with prior literature. Note that the rate of hairpin closing ( k close ) is exponentially dependent on the magnitude of applied force, and as the external force drops a few pN below F 1/2 , refolding rates will approach the ms time scale . Thus, the tension signal decreased immediately upon inhibitor treatment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The treated cells showed ∼50% less spread area and ∼80% less tension signal compared to untreated cells. This confirms that the reported tension is reversible and mediated by F-actin and myosin activity in alignment with prior literature. Note that the rate of hairpin closing ( k close ) is exponentially dependent on the magnitude of applied force, and as the external force drops a few pN below F 1/2 , refolding rates will approach the ms time scale . Thus, the tension signal decreased immediately upon inhibitor treatment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…60−62 Note that the rate of hairpin closing (k close ) is exponentially dependent on the magnitude of applied force, and as the external force drops a few pN below F 1/2 , refolding rates will approach the ms time scale. 63 Thus, the tension signal decreased immediately upon inhibitor treatment. HeLa Cell Integrins Generate F < 19 pN on 13 kPa Hydrogels.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In particular, we used the second version of the model that has been fine-tuned to improve the modelling of origami structure [27]. As a results of its accurate description of the structural [28] and mechanical [29] properties of DNA origami, it has been widely used in the field of DNA nanotechnology, particularly to describe origamis with increasingly functionally complex properties that are otherwise hard to predict [11,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. The oxDNA model is particularly well-suited to study jointed origami, as it can also capture the important local features of the junction, e.g., an accurate description of the mechanical properties of single-stranded DNA [26] is important to model the role of the single-stranded linkers on joint flexibility.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One area of increasing interest is their use as nanoscale mechanical devices [7]. In this field of DNA "mechanotechnology" [8] DNA constructs are used to generate [9][10][11], transmit [12] and sense [13] nanoscale forces. One approach is through the use of flexible DNA origami that can undergo large-scale structural changes [14][15][16]; for example, an externally-actuated shape change could be used to apply a force [17], or a force could be sensed through the change in structure it induces [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tools for manipulating signaling, activity, and function of specific cells in living organisms have enormous potential to promote novel perturbation biology approaches and unprecedented therapeutic strategies. The past decades have witnessed a drastic expansion in physical perturbation methods including nano-/​microelectrode arrays, , microfluidics, , optogenetics, upconversion nanoparticles, thermo­genetics, sono­genetics, , and mechano­genetics, , enabling neuro­modulation, stem cell differentiation, immune cell activation, and cell migration and adhesion with high spatio­temporal precision. However, despite their potential, broad in vivo applications of these tools have been lagging because of technical limitations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%