1996
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00479-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mast cell mediators excite the afferents of cat small intestine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The secondary response to 5‐HT occurred following a longer latency, usually after the initial response had subsided, and was characterized by a prolonged burst of firing that was coincident with an increase in intestinal pressure. Other groups have demonstrated intestinal afferent sensitivity to 5‐HT which follows a similar delayed time course (Lew & Longhurst, 1986; Akoev, Filippova & Sherman, 1996) but in the present study we have been able to demonstrate using waveform discrimination of single afferent units that this response to 5‐HT is mediated by a different population of afferents from those showing the initial 5‐HT response. The pharmacological profile of the secondary response was also different.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The secondary response to 5‐HT occurred following a longer latency, usually after the initial response had subsided, and was characterized by a prolonged burst of firing that was coincident with an increase in intestinal pressure. Other groups have demonstrated intestinal afferent sensitivity to 5‐HT which follows a similar delayed time course (Lew & Longhurst, 1986; Akoev, Filippova & Sherman, 1996) but in the present study we have been able to demonstrate using waveform discrimination of single afferent units that this response to 5‐HT is mediated by a different population of afferents from those showing the initial 5‐HT response. The pharmacological profile of the secondary response was also different.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…This may reflect the differential expression of receptors on intrinsic and extrinsic nerves. However, in the small intestine of the cat in vivo , histamine‐induced afferent discharge was attenuated by the H 2 antagonist cimetidine (Akoev et al 1996), although this response may have been secondary to motor responses triggered by high concentrations of histamine. Other studies have implicated the involvement of H 1 receptors in mediating the actions of endogenous histamine on ischaemically sensitive visceral afferents in the cat (Fu et al 1997) and the activation of mesenteric afferents in the rat (Kreis et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activation of blood platelets is another possible source of increased serotonin concentrations in the inflamed tissue (Hranilovic et al , 1996; Marcenac & Blache, 1985). It is known that histamine enhances oedema formation mainly through the activation of H 1 and H 2 receptors (Akoev et al , 1996; Schwartz et al , 1991), and that serotonin induces plasma extravasation through 5‐HT 1 ‐ and 5‐HT 3 ‐receptor activation (Richardson, 1990; Taiwo & Levine, 1992). In the present study the bilateral oedema formation was blocked by 5‐HT 2 and 5‐HT 3 but not by histamine H 1 and 5‐HT 1 receptor antagonists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be suggested that following the degranulation of mast cells and/or activation of blood platelets the proinflammatory substances are released. Thereafter, due to a close anatomical relationship between the mast cells and sensory nerves (Alving et al , 1991; Renda et al , 1992), there is an activation of nociceptive primary afferents (Akoev et al , 1996; Herbert & Schmidt, 1992) which triggers the release of neuropeptides, including CGRP, contributing to oedema formation (Maggi, 1995). Compared to SP, the capacity of CGRP in the activation of mast cells is less pronounced (Nilsson et al , 1990), most likely explaining why a dose of CGRP ten times lower (30 pmol, Newbold & Brain, 1993) than presently used did not induce hindpaw oedema formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%