2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpp.2018.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mastoid osteoma in a prehispanic cranium (1390 A.D.) from Northern Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In palaeopathology, research regarding osteomata has typically been approached on a case‐by‐case basis (Bartelink & Wright, 2011; Castro et al, 2019; Giuffra et al, 2019; Galassi, Varotto, Angelici, & Picchi, 2020; Premužić & Šikanjic, 2013; Smith, 2010). In regard to palaeoepidemiology, the prevalence of osteomata is typically reported in general terms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In palaeopathology, research regarding osteomata has typically been approached on a case‐by‐case basis (Bartelink & Wright, 2011; Castro et al, 2019; Giuffra et al, 2019; Galassi, Varotto, Angelici, & Picchi, 2020; Premužić & Šikanjic, 2013; Smith, 2010). In regard to palaeoepidemiology, the prevalence of osteomata is typically reported in general terms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the rational of Kaplan et al, (1994) can also be applied to cranial osteomata, Eshed et al (2002) suggested that, based on their histological features, these lesions be reclassified as hamartoma, a malformation that resembles a neoplasm but results from faulty development. In palaeopathological case reports of osteomata, these lesions are referred to as tumours, and the debate regarding their status as a neoplasm is either not mentioned or not discussed (Blau, 2006; Castro et al, 2019; Dąbrowski et al, 2015; Galassi et al, 2020; Giuffra et al, 2019; Licata, Borgo, Armocida, Nicosia, & Ferioli, 2016; Piombino‐Mascali, Zink, & Panzer, 2017; Premužić & Šikanjic, 2013; Odes et al, 2018; Smith, 2010; Zias, 2006). Bartelink and Wright (2011) seem to be the only researchers who did note this debate in their report of a mandibular tumour from Guatemala, dated to the 6 th to 9 th century CE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%