2009
DOI: 10.1109/joe.2008.2010658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matching a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator to a Fixed Pitch Vertical Axis Turbine for Marine Current Energy Conversion

Abstract: This is an author-produced version of a paper published in IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering. This paper has been peer-reviewed but does not include the final publisher proof-corrections or journal pagination.Citation for the published paper: Yuen K., Thomas K., Grabbe M., Deglaire P., Bouquerel M., Österberg D., Leijon M. "Matching a permanent magnet synchronous generator to a fixed pitch vertical axis turbine for marine current energy conversion" IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2009, 34(1) Access to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hydrokinetic turbines have a close similarity to wind turbines in terms of physical principles of operation, electrical hardware and variable speed capability for optimal energy extraction [48], however, the density of water is 800 times greater than the density of air, thus, a 12 miles per hour (mph) marine current generates the equivalent amount of force that is contained in a constant 110 mph wind [63], therefore, water turbines are more efficient than wind turbines even at low current speed. In addition, wind turbine technology requires a huge land area to operate, whereas hydrokinetic turbines can operate under water [64,20].…”
Section: Hydrokinetic Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hydrokinetic turbines have a close similarity to wind turbines in terms of physical principles of operation, electrical hardware and variable speed capability for optimal energy extraction [48], however, the density of water is 800 times greater than the density of air, thus, a 12 miles per hour (mph) marine current generates the equivalent amount of force that is contained in a constant 110 mph wind [63], therefore, water turbines are more efficient than wind turbines even at low current speed. In addition, wind turbine technology requires a huge land area to operate, whereas hydrokinetic turbines can operate under water [64,20].…”
Section: Hydrokinetic Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among different renewable energy options, hydropower is the prime choice to contribute to the world's energy generation because it is continuously available, high density, powerful, predictable and independent of random weather conditions, as opposed to solar and wind options, and has less impact on environmental and human activity [15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, gearboxes may be prone to failure and have high OPEX. 36,43 Directdrive PTOs reduce complexity by directly attaching the rotor shaft to the generator but require high torque, low speed generators. 8,34,36 These generators require improved controls and are more expensive due to the size, efficiency and cost of permanent magnets used.…”
Section: Improved Ptomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tidal turbines [30,31] Horizontal axis tidal turbines are the marine equivalent of wind turbines, with energy being extracted through the lift forces of the moving water on the turbine blades. The significantly higher density of sea water relative to air results in significantly smaller diameter turbine blades than equivalent power rated wind turbines.…”
Section: Point Absorber With Direct Pto [26]mentioning
confidence: 99%