2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2018.06.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matching preclusion number in product graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Section 3, we study the above extremal problems on fractional matching preclusion number. The results in this paper can be viewed as the fractional matching preclusion number analogues of those in [32]. So the basic structure of some of the proofs are similar.…”
Section: Extremal Problemmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In Section 3, we study the above extremal problems on fractional matching preclusion number. The results in this paper can be viewed as the fractional matching preclusion number analogues of those in [32]. So the basic structure of some of the proofs are similar.…”
Section: Extremal Problemmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The matching preclusion number of a graph G, denoted by mp(G), is the size of a smallest matching preclusion set of G. Any such optimal set is called an optimal matching preclusion set. The concept of matching preclusion was introduced by Birgham et al (Birgham, Harry, Biolin, & Yellen, 2005) and further studied in (Cheng, Lesniak, Lipman, & Lipták, 2008;Cheng, Lesniak, Lipman, Lipták, 2007;Wang, Mao, Cheng, & Zou, 2019;Wang, Melekian, Cheng, & Mao, 2019), with special attention to interconnection networks. For graphs with an even number of vertices, an obvious matching preclusion set is the set of edges incident with a single vertex; such a set is called a trivial matching preclusion set.…”
Section: (Strong) Matching Preclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also has connections to a number of other theoretical topics, including conditional connectivity and extremal graph theory. We refer the readers to Cheng and Lipták (2007); Cheng et al (2009); Jwo et al (1993); Li et al (2016); Mao et al (2018); Wang et al (2019) for further details and additional references.…”
Section: (Strong) Matching Preclusion Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%