1977
DOI: 10.4153/cjm-1977-016-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matchings in Countable Graphs

Abstract: Tutte [9] has given necessary and sufficient conditions for a finite graph to have a perfect matching. Different proofs are given by Brualdi [1] and Gallai [2; 3]. The shortest proof of Tutte's theorem is due to Lovasz [5]. In another paper [10] Tutte extended his conditions for a perfect matching to locally finite graphs. In [4] Kaluza gave a condition on arbitrary graphs which is entirely different from Tutte's.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An even stronger notion than strong maximality of a matching in a graph is that of having (inclusion-wise) maximal support. Similarly to the proof of Lemma 3.1 it is possible to show: In [7] the following stronger version of Theorem 1.3 was proved for countable graphs:…”
Section: Strongly Maximal Matchings In Graphsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…An even stronger notion than strong maximality of a matching in a graph is that of having (inclusion-wise) maximal support. Similarly to the proof of Lemma 3.1 it is possible to show: In [7] the following stronger version of Theorem 1.3 was proved for countable graphs:…”
Section: Strongly Maximal Matchings In Graphsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In particular, each U can be dominated by at most one vertex. Moreover, (7) implies (i) and (ii): Indeed, consider any set U ∈ U i . For every v ∈ U , the symmetric difference of M i with the M i -alternating x U -v path of even length in G ′ i [U ] is a matching of U − v, which shows (i).…”
Section: Strongly Maximal Weighted Matchingsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations