2019
DOI: 10.1177/1368431019839252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Materialized ideology and environmental problems: The cases of solar geoengineering and agricultural biotechnology

Abstract: This article expands upon the notion of ideology as a material phenomenon, usually in the form of institutionalized, taken-for-granted practices. It draws on Herbert Marcuse and related thinkers to conceptualize technological solutions to environmental problems as materialized ideological responses to social-ecological contradictions, which, by concealing these contradictions, reproduce existing social conditions. This article outlines a method of technology assessment as ideology critique that draws attention… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent paper about SRM and new agricultural biotechnology highlights the problem of narrow abstraction and the fetishization of phenomena. Inspired by the analytical tradition of Frankfurt School critical theory, Gunderson et al (2020) focus on the language of technology assessment. They identify four potential problems, namely that (i) the political economic determinants of a given technology are hidden; (ii) the technology may conceal chronic socialecological contradictions; (iii) the technology may reproduce existing, unjust social conditions; and (iv) the technology may be used for more rational or emancipatory ends in different social conditions but these possibilities are occluded.…”
Section: Risk 1: Narrow Abstraction and Fetishization Through Conventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent paper about SRM and new agricultural biotechnology highlights the problem of narrow abstraction and the fetishization of phenomena. Inspired by the analytical tradition of Frankfurt School critical theory, Gunderson et al (2020) focus on the language of technology assessment. They identify four potential problems, namely that (i) the political economic determinants of a given technology are hidden; (ii) the technology may conceal chronic socialecological contradictions; (iii) the technology may reproduce existing, unjust social conditions; and (iv) the technology may be used for more rational or emancipatory ends in different social conditions but these possibilities are occluded.…”
Section: Risk 1: Narrow Abstraction and Fetishization Through Conventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…renewable energy) (Gunderson et al, 2018b). Whether a technology could be used for more rational ends in different social conditions requires an analysis of the given technology, an approach to technology assessment that is neither Promethean nor technophobic (Gunderson et al, 2019a). As awareness of these social relations and constraints increases, so do calls for social-structural transformation, for shifting priorities to put social and ecological well-being before profit, and for reducing total material and energy throughput to stay within ecological limits (Foster, 2010; Kallis, 2018; Kallis et al, 2012).…”
Section: Conclusion: Toward a New Social Metabolismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indonesia is rich in natural aromatic materials, consisting of three types of aromatic plants from 22 different families, namely Asteraceae [1], Hypericaceae [2], Lauraceae, Myrtaceae [3], Pinaceae [4], Rubiaceae [5], Rutaceae, and Solanaceae [6], each having major aromatic compound components known as essential oils [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, essential oils have long been used to repel insects in the form of pests of grains and nuts in storage warehouses [17]. Essential oils can have several effects on insects, namely as repellents [18], attractants [19], contact poisons, fumigants [20], antifeedant [21], and oviposition deterrent [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%