2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2011.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Materials challenges and technical approaches for realizing inexpensive and robust iron–air batteries for large-scale energy storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
149
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
149
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rechargeable batteries are particularly attractive for electrical energy storage because of their high energy efficiency and scalability. [1][2][3] However, for such a largescale application, these batteries must be inexpensive, robust, safe, and sustainable. None of today's commercially-available batteries can meet all the performance and cost targets at this scale of deployment of energy storage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rechargeable batteries are particularly attractive for electrical energy storage because of their high energy efficiency and scalability. [1][2][3] However, for such a largescale application, these batteries must be inexpensive, robust, safe, and sustainable. None of today's commercially-available batteries can meet all the performance and cost targets at this scale of deployment of energy storage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8,33,34 Consequently, at high rates of discharge, the active material in the iron electrode is poorly utilized. In commercial electrodes, complete passivation of the iron electrode occurs even at rates of C/5, and almost no capacity is obtainable at higher discharge rates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of sulfide ions in the electrolyte was determined from the electrode potentials of the sulfide selective reference electrode according to Equation 6, where E S 2− is the potential of the sulfide reference electrode and C S 2− is the concentration of sulfide ions in the electrolyte. 47 E S 2− = −610.8 mV − 28.1 log C S 2− [6] The concentration of sulfide in the electrolyte at the beginning of formation was 6.4×10 −2 mole/L. After the capacity decrease at around the 200 th cycle, the sulfide concentration in the electrolyte had decreased to a very low value of 10 −17 mole/L.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%