2021
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202105488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Materials for Silicon Quantum Dots and their Impact on Electron Spin Qubits

Abstract: Quantum computers have the potential to efficiently solve problems in logistics, drug and material design, finance, and cybersecurity. However, millions of qubits will be necessary for correcting inevitable errors in quantum operations. In this scenario, electron spins in gate‐defined silicon quantum dots are strong contenders for encoding qubits, leveraging the microelectronics industry know‐how for fabricating densely populated chips with nanoscale electrodes. The sophisticated material combinations used in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
(179 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that for SiMOS spin qubit devices, the qubit frequencies are different due to the variability in spin-orbit effects caused by the imperfections (e.g. surface roughness) in the Si-SiO 2 interface 37 . By monitoring how the qubit frequencies change due to Stark shifts from voltages applied to the different gates (see analysis in the Supplementary Note 5), we deduce that the spin resonance signal at the higher frequency (for a fixed B 0 ) corresponds to the spin under gate D1, whilst the other resonance belongs to the spin under D2.…”
Section: Single Spin Resonancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that for SiMOS spin qubit devices, the qubit frequencies are different due to the variability in spin-orbit effects caused by the imperfections (e.g. surface roughness) in the Si-SiO 2 interface 37 . By monitoring how the qubit frequencies change due to Stark shifts from voltages applied to the different gates (see analysis in the Supplementary Note 5), we deduce that the spin resonance signal at the higher frequency (for a fixed B 0 ) corresponds to the spin under gate D1, whilst the other resonance belongs to the spin under D2.…”
Section: Single Spin Resonancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) like photochemical reagents, 66 light emitting diodes, 67 catalysis, 68 solar cells, 69 due to their properties such as photochemical, 70-72 magnetic, [73][74][75][76] optoelectrical, [77][78][79] piezoelectrical. [80][81][82][83] QDs with enhancing properties exhibited by the semiconductors are proved as an effective electrocatalysts in HER in the current research. Predominantly, due to reduction in size, the metallic materials will have a wider surface area, less mechanical fracture and larger active sites, amidst the above attractive characteristics, metallic QDs lack good electrical conductivity and have a higher tendency to agglomerate, 84,85 thus making them inefficient as a single-component electrocatalyst, but QDs effectively work when they are engineered in composites.…”
Section: Transition Metal Quantum Dots: Synthesis and Their Applicati...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results, presented in Fig. 2 for a particular choice of zero-field splitting and exchange parameters [31], show the average population p 5 (t) of the quintet manifold 5…”
Section: A Stochastic Conformational Switching At Zero-fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exchange noise can arise from many sources, including thermally-driven structural fluctuations, switching in nearby charge centres [1,2], and electrical noise in voltages applied to control gates [3] in engineered systems. Quantum dot systems [4,5] are a prime example of this and, due to their potential applications in quantum information processing, advanced approaches to quantifying the impact of exchange noise have been developed [6]. Fundamentally, these approaches have sought to efficiently model open quantum systems (OQS), i.e., quantum systems coupled to their environment [7], as a way to understand and improve fidelity of gate operations [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation