2020
DOI: 10.3390/nano10091788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Materials Testing for the Development of Biocompatible Devices through Vat-Polymerization 3D Printing

Abstract: Light-based 3D printing techniques could be a valuable instrument in the development of customized and affordable biomedical devices, basically for high precision and high flexibility in terms of materials of these technologies. However, more studies related to the biocompatibility of the printed objects are required to expand the use of these techniques in the health sector. In this work, 3D printed polymeric parts are produced in lab conditions using a commercial Digital Light Processing (DLP) 3D printer and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the DLP technology shows high resolution (~1 μm) and fast printing speed (3 mm/s −1 ) for the production of unique 3D objects [ 34 ]. The DLP printing, originally used just for prototyping, is now finding its application in several fields, such as in biomedics [ 35 ] where DLP is proposed for the production of customized medical devices [ 36 ], for tissue engineering [ 37 ] and drug delivery [ 38 ] but also in soft robotics [ 39 ], microfluidics [ 40 ], sensing [ 41 ] and several others fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the DLP technology shows high resolution (~1 μm) and fast printing speed (3 mm/s −1 ) for the production of unique 3D objects [ 34 ]. The DLP printing, originally used just for prototyping, is now finding its application in several fields, such as in biomedics [ 35 ] where DLP is proposed for the production of customized medical devices [ 36 ], for tissue engineering [ 37 ] and drug delivery [ 38 ] but also in soft robotics [ 39 ], microfluidics [ 40 ], sensing [ 41 ] and several others fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, photopolymers are often more toxic due to their nature and the potential residues that remain following the photo-curing processes (132). Several studies considered 3D printed objects using SLA technology as toxic when used directly in biological applications without postprocessing (147)(148)(149). Accordingly, photoinitiators (e.g.…”
Section: Current 3d Printing Challenges and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the reasons that have been suggested to underlie toxicity is the chemical composition of the 3D printing material itself. Often, the complete formulation of these materials is only known to the manufacturers, but photoinitiators and acrylate monomers are known to be toxic for living organisms (148). Material Residues remaining on the printed objects' surface can be washed with ethanol, sonication, and sterilised with UV light (148).…”
Section: Current 3d Printing Challenges and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas powder bed fusion and binder jetting utilize powders as feedstock [ 6 , 7 ], and the point of difference is the basic additive manufacturing principle where the former is based on the selective fusion of material in the powder bed [ 8 ], and the latter is based on reactive curing of the material in the powder bed [ 9 ]. These processes and feedstock utilize thermal reaction bonding except for binder jetting which, despite being a powder bed-based platform, utilizes the basic AM principle of chemical reaction bonding, which is similar to the AM processes such as material jetting, and vat photopolymerization [ 10 , 11 ]. The SLS 3D printing process falls under powder bed fusion processes which involves a powder bed-based feedstock layer being selectively fused utilizing a thermal stimulus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%