SummaryWe contacted the duty obstetric anaesthetist in 219 of the 220 consultant-led maternity units in the UK (99.5%) and asked about departmental and individual practice regarding temperature management during Caesarean section. Warming during elective Caesarean section was routine in 35 units (16%). Intravenous fluid warmers were available in 213 units (97%), forced air warmers were available in 211 (96%) and warming mattresses were available in 42 (19%). Only 18 (8%) departments had specific guidelines for temperature management during Caesarean section. Personal intra-operative practice was variable, although all of those contacted would initiate some form of active temperature management after a mean (SD) volume of blood loss of 1282 (404) ml, length of surgery of 78 (24) Peri-operative hypothermia in non-obstetric cases has been found to increase wound infection rates and length of hospital stay [1], operative blood loss [2], and anaesthetic recovery time [3]. Few studies have included obstetric patients but although Caesarean sections are relatively short procedures, there is still a risk of hypothermia [4][5][6][7] and it has been recently suggested that all mothers should be warmed during Caesarean section [8]. We wished to ascertain which, if any, methods of warming were being used in the UK.
MethodsWe identified consultant-led obstetric units from the Birth Choice website (http://www.birthchoiceuk.com) and one of two investigators contacted the duty obstetric anaesthetist by telephone during office hours (0800-1800, Monday to Friday) over a period of 5 months. If the anaesthetists were busy, we called back on another day and spoke to someone else. We asked, using a standard questionnaire, about the availability of different warming devices and departmental practice regarding temperature management during elective Caesarean section and in recovery. We also asked the individual anaesthetists about their personal thresholds for initiating temperature measurement and for active warming during Caesarean section.
ResultsWe were able to contact anaesthetists in 219 of the 220 units listed (99.5%), the other unit not having dedicated obstetric anaesthetic cover during office hours. Twentyfour (11%) were senior house officers ⁄ specialist trainees (years 1-2), 89 (40%) were specialist registrars ⁄ specialist trainees (years 3-5), 65 (30%) were staff grades ⁄ associate specialists and 41 (19%) were consultants. The median (IQR [range]) time that the anaesthetists had spent in the department was 1.0 (0.3-6.0 [0.2-22.0]) years. None had been contacted by us at a previous unit before rotating to a new one.