1999
DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.35.2.580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal behaviors and cognitions during discipline episodes: A comparison of power bouts and single acts of noncompliance.

Abstract: Maternal behaviors and cognitions within power bouts and single acts of noncompliance were compared by using 2 methodologies. Ninety mothers completed daily telephone interviews concerning their children's misbehavior for 12 days. Half of the mothers also completed a computerized simulation of 3 different power bouts, and the other half of the mothers completed a similar simulation of 3 sets of single noncompliance episodes. Mothers made behavioral intention choices and rated their perceptions of the child's b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basing effect sizes on simple associations between a disciplinary tactic and a child outcome implicitly compares parents who use that disciplinary tactic with those who do not use it. Instead of choosing between a given disciplinary tactic and doing nothing, parents typically choose between two or more alternative disciplinary responses (Ritchie, 1999). Differences in effect sizes are better suited for such comparisons.…”
Section: Rationale For a Meta-analysis Of Differential Effect Sizesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basing effect sizes on simple associations between a disciplinary tactic and a child outcome implicitly compares parents who use that disciplinary tactic with those who do not use it. Instead of choosing between a given disciplinary tactic and doing nothing, parents typically choose between two or more alternative disciplinary responses (Ritchie, 1999). Differences in effect sizes are better suited for such comparisons.…”
Section: Rationale For a Meta-analysis Of Differential Effect Sizesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defiant noncompliance in young children predicts poorer moral internalization as well as a greater risk of antisocial behavior (Kochanska & Aksan, 1995;Loeber & Schmaling, 1985;Lytton, Watts, & Dunn, 1986;Patterson, Reid, & Dishion, 1992). Mothers are also more likely to respond to defiant noncompliance with harsh forms of punishment (Ritchie, 1999).…”
Section: Behavioral Compliance As a Beneficial Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When they perceive children to be at fault, parents rate harsh corporal punishment (e.g., hitting with an object such as a belt) as less severe than if children were not at fault (Rodriguez & Sutherland, 1999). If children display escalated disobedience (i.e., knowingly disobey after being reprimanded), parents are more likely to use corporal punishment (Gershoff, Miller, & Holden, 1999;Holden, Miller, & Harris, 1999;Peterson et al, 1994; K. L. Ritchie, 1999). What time of day the child misbehaves may determine whether corporal punishment is used, as a majority of spankings occur between 5 p.m. and bedtime (Holden et al, 1995).…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Misbehaviormentioning
confidence: 99%