IntroductionEcological comparisons between urban or industrial environments and natural areas emphasize their differences (Lundholm and Richardson, 2010). Humanmodified ecosystems are considered to be ecologically novel in that climatic conditions, soils, toxins, hydrology, productivity, species composition, and interactions (Pickett et al., 2001) differ from conditions prevailing prior to human alterations (Lundholm and Richardson, 2010). The physical, chemical, and biological properties are generally less favorable than those in soil found on natural landscapes. For instance, urban soils are characterized by modified soil organism activity and modified soil temperature regimes, elevated soil reaction (pH), greater nutrient amounts and availability to plants, higher calcium levels, more rocks, greater decomposition rates, less accumulated organic matter, and compacted mixtures of anthropogenic materials compared with local remnants of the natural ecosystems (McDonnell et al., 1997).Many orchid habitats are liable to be lost to development, since they are often postindustrial, and may even be contaminated. In contrast, anthropogenic analogues of natural habitats provide refuge for many rare or threatened and endangered species such as Orchidaceae (Pedersen et al., 2013). The most common colonizers of secondary habitats in temperate Europe are Epipactis and Dactylorhiza, species with short life cycles and broad ecological amplitudes. Substrates rich in CaCO 3 , high light availability, and diminished competition resulting from disturbance of the upper soil level are common in habitats colonized by orchids (