2016
DOI: 10.1016/s1751-4851(16)30194-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal Obesity, Gestational Diabetes, and Early-Onset Puberty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the remaining 248, 230 were not relevant to the research question and were excluded on the basis of title and abstract, leaving 18 studies for full-text assessment. Eleven articles were excluded at this stage: four articles were conference proceedings, oral presentations or commentary articles ( 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ); two articles did not include any of the outcomes we were interested in ( 18 , 19 ); one article did not analyse GDM as a predictor for pubertal timing due to an insufficient number of subjects with GDM ( 20 ); two articles did not provide a comparator cohort ( 21 , 22 ); two articles only reported Tanner stage at baseline and did not consider age/timing of puberty ( 23 , 24 ). The seven remaining studies were included in the review ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the remaining 248, 230 were not relevant to the research question and were excluded on the basis of title and abstract, leaving 18 studies for full-text assessment. Eleven articles were excluded at this stage: four articles were conference proceedings, oral presentations or commentary articles ( 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ); two articles did not include any of the outcomes we were interested in ( 18 , 19 ); one article did not analyse GDM as a predictor for pubertal timing due to an insufficient number of subjects with GDM ( 20 ); two articles did not provide a comparator cohort ( 21 , 22 ); two articles only reported Tanner stage at baseline and did not consider age/timing of puberty ( 23 , 24 ). The seven remaining studies were included in the review ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the remaining 248, were not relevant to the research question and were excluded on the basis of title and abstract, leaving 18 studies for full-text assessment. Eleven articles were excluded at this stage: four articles were conference proceedings, oral presentations or commentary articles (13)(14)(15)(16); two articles did not include any of the outcomes we were interested in (17,18); one article did not analyse GDM as a predictor for pubertal timing due to an insufficient number of subjects with GDM (19); two articles did not provide a comparator cohort (20,21); two articles only reported Tanner stage at baseline and did not consider age/timing of puberty (22,23). The seven remaining studies were included in the review (Fig.…”
Section: Literature Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%