2005
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal uniparental disomy 14 in a 15‐year‐old boy with normal karyotype and no evidence of precocious puberty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, although a relatively large number of patients with UPD(14)mat phenotype have been reported in the literature (reviewed in reference Hoffmann et al ), 10 we could identify only six UPD(14)mat patients with normal karyotype in whom maternal age at childbirth was documented and microsatellite analysis was performed. 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 Furthermore, the microsatellite data are insufficient to identify the subtype of UPD(14)mat and to distinguish between M1 and M2 non-disjunction in the TR/GC subtype. Thus, while the maternal age at childbirth may be advanced in five patients with apparently TR/GC-mediated UPD(14)mat (27, 35, 37, 41, and 44 years) 25, 26, 27, 29, 30 (the maternal age at childbirth in the remaining one patient with apparently MR/PE-mediated UPD(14)mat is 40 years), 28 the notion of a maternal age effect awaits further investigations for UPD(14)mat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, although a relatively large number of patients with UPD(14)mat phenotype have been reported in the literature (reviewed in reference Hoffmann et al ), 10 we could identify only six UPD(14)mat patients with normal karyotype in whom maternal age at childbirth was documented and microsatellite analysis was performed. 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 Furthermore, the microsatellite data are insufficient to identify the subtype of UPD(14)mat and to distinguish between M1 and M2 non-disjunction in the TR/GC subtype. Thus, while the maternal age at childbirth may be advanced in five patients with apparently TR/GC-mediated UPD(14)mat (27, 35, 37, 41, and 44 years) 25, 26, 27, 29, 30 (the maternal age at childbirth in the remaining one patient with apparently MR/PE-mediated UPD(14)mat is 40 years), 28 the notion of a maternal age effect awaits further investigations for UPD(14)mat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characteristic signs of the paternal UPD of chromosome 14 include polhydramnios, abdominal muscular defects, characteristic facies (plagiocephaly, short palpebral fissures, epicanthal folds, flat nasal root, anterverted nares, long philtrum, small mouth, redundant nuchal skin folds, inverted nipples and hypotonia) and specific thoracic dystrophy [31]. The clinical features of maternal UPD consist in pre-and postnatal growth retardation, neonatal hypotonia, feeding problems, precocious puberty, truncal obesity and development delay [2,4]. In the patients with 14q deletion reported in literature, the UPD for the chromosome 14 has been checked only in 10 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Polyhydramnios, abdominal muscular defects, characteristic facies (plagiocephaly, short palpebral fissures, epicanthal folds, flat nasal root, anteverted nares, long philtrum, small mouth, redundant nuchal skin folds, inverted nipples, hypotonia), specific thoracic dystrophy, typical of paternal UDP14 were not present in the fetus [Stevenson et al, 2004]. Likewise, short stature that is typical of maternal UDP was also absent [Aretz et al, 2005]. Neonatal transient hydrocephalus is often associated with maternal UDP but, in this case, it is a spontaneously arrested hydrocephalus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%