2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13567-016-0365-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternally-derived antibodies do not prevent transmission of swine influenza A virus between pigs

Abstract: A transmission experiment involving 5-week-old specific-pathogen-free (SPF) piglets, with (MDA+) or without maternally-derived antibodies (MDA−), was carried out to evaluate the impact of passive immunity on the transmission of a swine influenza A virus (swIAV). In each group (MDA+/MDA−), 2 seeders were placed with 4 piglets in direct contact and 5 in indirect contact (3 replicates per group). Serological kinetics (ELISA) and individual viral shedding (RT-PCR) were monitored for 28 days after infection. MDA wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S2) is too young to have been infected and recovered. Previous work shows that maternally derived antibodies may affect IAV transmission dynamics, but transmission from individuals with maternal antibodies still occurs (i.e., reproduction number is substantially greater than 1 for individuals with maternally derived antibodies; (Cador et al 2016). Thus, for simplicity we assumed that maternal antibodies did not affect immunity.…”
Section: Framework To Estimate Iav Infection Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S2) is too young to have been infected and recovered. Previous work shows that maternally derived antibodies may affect IAV transmission dynamics, but transmission from individuals with maternal antibodies still occurs (i.e., reproduction number is substantially greater than 1 for individuals with maternally derived antibodies; (Cador et al 2016). Thus, for simplicity we assumed that maternal antibodies did not affect immunity.…”
Section: Framework To Estimate Iav Infection Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… a β 1 is 1.41 in the service room [ 16 ] as sows are reared in specific conditions (see “Parametrization” section for more details). …”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, field data suggest a possible reinfection in sows which could explain the observed rise of HI (Hemagglutination Inhibition) titres according to parity [ 4 , 5 ]. Newborn piglets born to immune sows acquire swIAV MDAs by colostrum intake (health state M) providing partial protection towards infection [ 4 , 13 , 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After publication of the original article [ 1 ], the authors noticed an error in Table 2 in the “Results” section. In the last column the R 0 estimated values have been reversed between groups.…”
Section: Erratum To: Vet Res (2016) 47:86 Doi 101186/s13567-016-0365mentioning
confidence: 99%