2017
DOI: 10.4310/jsg.2017.v15.n3.a5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

$\mathcal{VB}$-groupoids and representation theory of Lie groupoids

Abstract: A VB-groupoid is a Lie groupoid equipped with a compatible linear structure. In this paper, we describe a correspondence, up to isomorphism, between VB-groupoids and 2-term representations up to homotopy of Lie groupoids. Under this correspondence, the tangent bundle of a Lie groupoid G corresponds to the "adjoint representation" of G. The value of this point of view is that the tangent bundle is canonical, whereas the adjoint representation is not.We define a cochain complex that is canonically associated to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
139
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
139
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and Ω g1,g2 : E s(g2) → C t(g1) the curvature term associated to the representation (see [1,22]). The semidirect product of G with the ruth is the vector bundle V = t * C ⊕ s * E → G endowed with the VB-groupoid structure V ⇒ E given by:…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…and Ω g1,g2 : E s(g2) → C t(g1) the curvature term associated to the representation (see [1,22]). The semidirect product of G with the ruth is the vector bundle V = t * C ⊕ s * E → G endowed with the VB-groupoid structure V ⇒ E given by:…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definitions and the fat representations. Following [22], we define the fat category of V as the category whose space of objects is F (V), the space of pointwise splittings of the core exact sequence (2.2). More precisely, an element of…”
Section: 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Contrary to the situation for Lie groups, general Lie groupoids do not admit an "adjoint representation" (see however 3.13 and Example 3.14). As a consequence, one was led to the generalised notion of a "representations up to homotopy", see [GSM17]. In the present article, we will only consider the classical concept, which appears naturally in applications (e.g.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%