1995
DOI: 10.1016/0360-1315(95)00049-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical ability assessed by computer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, in chemistry and computing, in line with the earlier studies in mathematics, Beevers et al (1995) and Fiddes et al (2002), the following questions were posed:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, in chemistry and computing, in line with the earlier studies in mathematics, Beevers et al (1995) and Fiddes et al (2002), the following questions were posed:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be emphasized that computerized adaptive testing is different from computerized administrated testing which usually refers to a mechanism that randomly select a test item or a subtest from a pool of items with regardless of the ability of the examinee (see, e.g. Beevers et al, 1995). In contrast, a CAT system adaptively selects an item according to the estimate of the ability of examinee based on his or her responses to previous items.…”
Section: Potential Advantages Of Computerized Adaptive Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Exam mode a student has to decide whether the extra tune is worthwhile compared with the partial credit on offer in that question. This method of awarding partial credit has been steadily evolving over the last few years since the original experiment in 1994 was reported by Beevers, McGuire, Stirling and Wild (1995). Whatever the mode, this extra flexibility has proved popular with students and has been introduced after much student feedback on earlier versions of the CALM test.…”
Section: Key-steps and Partial Creditmentioning
confidence: 99%