2018
DOI: 10.3738/1982.2278.2910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MATHEMATICAL MODELS FOR TEAK FOLIAR AREA ESTIMATION(Tectonas grandis L. f.)

Abstract: Esta pesquisa, objetivou obter uma equação que, por meio de parâmetros lineares dimensionais das folhas, permita a estimativa da área foliar de Tectonas grandis L. f.. Em agosto de 2015 até setembro de 2016, foram coletados 354 limbos foliares retirados do terço mediano da copa das árvores de três tecais localizado em Capitão poço, Irituia e Garrafão do Norte, situado na microrregião do Pará. A área foliar foi determinada pelo método dos discos. Ajustaram-se modelos lineares, lineares sem intercepto, quadrátic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a slight variation in angular coefficient, ranging from 0.73 to 0.86 (Figure 4), indicating the possibility to use the general equation (LA = 0.78 (L.W), R² = 0.97). The values of linear regression coefficient found in this study are close to those already found for trees and grasses, such as Tectonas grandis (R² = 0.88) Braga et al (2018).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…There was a slight variation in angular coefficient, ranging from 0.73 to 0.86 (Figure 4), indicating the possibility to use the general equation (LA = 0.78 (L.W), R² = 0.97). The values of linear regression coefficient found in this study are close to those already found for trees and grasses, such as Tectonas grandis (R² = 0.88) Braga et al (2018).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Thus, at least 88% variation in leaf areas were explained by the proposed alometrics equations. The equations using L.W met the best assumptions for predicting leaf area than those that used L and W, better fitting the regression models (Mota et al 2014;Assis et al 2015;Braga et al 2018;Lucena et al 2018;Pezzini et al 2018;Leite et al 2019;Oliveira et al 2019a;Ribeiro et al 2019a). Though, except for the exponential model, that was best fitted using L.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%