2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-27818-4_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical Service Matching Using Description Logic and OWL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interactions between ontologies (the Ontology Web Language (OWL) is used to describe each ontology) that form part of the MONET project [6] can be found in Fig. 1 and include:…”
Section: Monet Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interactions between ontologies (the Ontology Web Language (OWL) is used to describe each ontology) that form part of the MONET project [6] can be found in Fig. 1 and include:…”
Section: Monet Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Load of the service copy The load of the service copy is the number of copy services having the same function being accessed [14,15] . According to Fig.7(a) and Fig.7(b), take samples from probability and statistics of the copy services by using keyword discovering model and ontologydriven discovering model in a test period (one week).…”
Section: Fig 4 Relation Of Semantic Factors and Conflict Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, current publications [1] seem to indicate that matching is limited to processing taxonomies and the functional issues raised by pre-and post-conditions are not considered. The MONET broker [3], in conjunction with the RACER reasoner and the Instance Store demonstrated one of the earliest uses of a description logic reasoner to identify services based on taxonomic descriptions coming closest to the objective of the plug-ins developed for GENSS in attempting to provide functional matching of task and capability.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%