1973
DOI: 10.2307/3225241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mating Behavior and Ultrastructural Aspects of Copulation in the Rotifer Asplanchna brightwelli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This appears to be a widespread phenomenon in monogonont rotifers. Males of species of the genus Asplanchna copulate with mictic as well as with amictic females (Whitney 1913;Aloia & Moretti 1973) and so do males of B. calyciflorus and Brachionus angularis (Gilbert 1963) and males of Rhinoglena frontalis (T. Schrö der, unpublished data). The fact that males cannot distinguish between amictic and mictic eggs is puzzling because there would seem to be a large selective advantage of a discrimination, because rotifer males are often limited in their fertile time period or in their number of sperm, or both (Snell & Childress 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This appears to be a widespread phenomenon in monogonont rotifers. Males of species of the genus Asplanchna copulate with mictic as well as with amictic females (Whitney 1913;Aloia & Moretti 1973) and so do males of B. calyciflorus and Brachionus angularis (Gilbert 1963) and males of Rhinoglena frontalis (T. Schrö der, unpublished data). The fact that males cannot distinguish between amictic and mictic eggs is puzzling because there would seem to be a large selective advantage of a discrimination, because rotifer males are often limited in their fertile time period or in their number of sperm, or both (Snell & Childress 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, males are not able to discriminate between eggs of mictic and amictic females. Similarly, males of Asplanchna brightwelli and Brachionus calyciflorus seemed unable to discriminate between mictic and amictic females (Gilbert, 1963;Aloia & Moretti, 1973).…”
Section: Male Mating Behaviormentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We further showed that males cannot discriminate virgin females from those who have already copulated, nor can they discriminate resting egg hatchlings (always amictic females) from amictic egg hatchlings (amictic or mictic females). Similar male mate choice has been described for other monogonont species including B. calyciflorus (Gilbert, 1963;Gilbert & Walsh, 2005), Asplanchna brightwelli (Aloia & Moretti, 1973), and Epiphanes senta (Schröder, 2003). Male fitness is not only determined by their chemosensory abilities to discriminate potential mates, but also determined by the persistence of male mating behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%