1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-1536(81)80007-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mating behaviour, mycelial antagonism and the establishment of individuals in Stereum hirsutum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that mating between the primary mycelia of outcrossing species is permitted by the suppression of the somatic incompatibility mechanisms which prevent successful hyphal fusions between secondary mycelia (Coates et at., 1981). It is possible that some form of heterokaryosis can occur between genetically distinct mycelia of homomictic species during the short period of time when the young mycelium is undergoing autodikaryosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that mating between the primary mycelia of outcrossing species is permitted by the suppression of the somatic incompatibility mechanisms which prevent successful hyphal fusions between secondary mycelia (Coates et at., 1981). It is possible that some form of heterokaryosis can occur between genetically distinct mycelia of homomictic species during the short period of time when the young mycelium is undergoing autodikaryosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, all non-self sibling interactions differed from self-pairings, producing a range of reactions including the mating-compatible, 'bow-tie' and mutual rejection responses originally identified by Coates et al (1981). The same range of interactions were observed when members of this progeny set were paired with F2 testers, allowing them to be assigned to Cl and C2 mating-types.…”
Section: Morphology Of Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The F2 and EPl tester strains were paired in all combinations to confirm their mating-type designations using the criteria of Coates et al, (1981). Two to nine strains representing each of the four tester mating types were selected and paired against the F2.4t/EP1.7, F2.4/EP1.7 and half (strains 1-40) of the F2.4t, tip 3 progeny sets.…”
Section: Profyeny Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…turned out to be bipolar, in spite of clamped primary mycelia. The distinction between homo-and heterokaryotic mycelia in these species can be made on the basis of the mycelial morphology (Coates et al 1981, Boddy & Rayner 1982, Rayner & Turton 1982.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It often occurs together with holocoenocytic nuclear behaviour (multinucleate cells in primary and secondary mycelia). Of course, it is not a sure proof of homothallism, and the existence of clamp connections in homokaryotic mycelia of a heterothallic species has recently been demonstrated in a species of Coprinus (Kemp 1980), and in some species of Stereum (Coates et al 1981, Boddy & Rayner 1982, Rayner & Turton 1982.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%