1999
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6884530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mating systems and interfertility of swamp milkweed (Asclepias incarnata ssp. incarnata and ssp. pulchra)

Abstract: Mating systems and interfertility of swamp milkweed (Asclepias incarnatasspWe investigated the breeding system and interfertility of both subspecies of Asclepias incarnata. We performed hand-pollinations in the glasshouse to compare fruit-set from self-vs. crosspollinations and to assess interfertility in crosses between the subspecies. We also used horizontal starch-gel electrophoresis to infer mating-system parameters from open-pollinated progeny arrays in three natural populations over two consecutive years… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, only one other milkweed species has been found to have a completely self-compatible breeding system, namely A. incarnata (Swamp Milkweed). In studies of this species, Kephart (1981) documented nearly equivalent success rates of fruit-set in crossed treatments as compared to selfed treatments in a handpollination experiment, whereas Ivey et al (1999) found cross-pollinations to be more successful than self-pollinations in hand-pollination experiments as well as in open-pollinated progeny arrays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Indeed, only one other milkweed species has been found to have a completely self-compatible breeding system, namely A. incarnata (Swamp Milkweed). In studies of this species, Kephart (1981) documented nearly equivalent success rates of fruit-set in crossed treatments as compared to selfed treatments in a handpollination experiment, whereas Ivey et al (1999) found cross-pollinations to be more successful than self-pollinations in hand-pollination experiments as well as in open-pollinated progeny arrays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In all of these calculations, we included values of zero for flowers that did not set fruit, except in the case of A. incarnata hand-pollinated controls, for which we included only flowers that produced fruits or were known to have aborted fruits, because we suspect that many of our hand pollinations were unsuccessful. Although fruit set from hand pollinations under ideal greenhouse conditions is typically low (<50%) in this species (Ivey et al 1999), our hand pollinations were successful for only 2, 3, 7, 5, and 18 flowers in each phenological treatment; thus, fruit set was as low as 3% for some of our treatment groups (data not shown). We used the seed set of one open-pollinated flower per field control plant that produced at least one mature fruit, including zero values for each field control plant that did not produce fruit, as an additional gauge of the maximum pollination success of A. incarnata on any given field day.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Although A. incarnata populations vary in levels of self incompatibility (Ivey et al 1999), they are nonautogamous and therefore dependent on insects, with paired umbels of small pink flowers that produce nectar as the sole reward. Plants flower from late June to mid-August in our study area.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compatibility in milkweeds may vary among individuals and populations (cf. Ivey et al 1999;Lipow & Wyatt 2000). Even in self-compatible milkweeds, cross-pollination usually produces higher fruit set (Ivey et al 1999;Lipow & Wyatt 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%