2001
DOI: 10.1080/07060660109506917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mating type distribution and incidence of the teleomorph ofAscochyta rabiei(Didymella rabiei) in Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sexual reproduction is controlled by a single regulatory locus referred to as a mating-type locus and alternate sequences at the mating-type locus are completely dissimilar and code for different regulatory genes. The presence of opposite mating types (MAT1-1 and MAT1-2) and the teleomorph have been reported from some chickpea-growing regions in the world [24][25][26][27][28][29]. The morphological characteristics of A. rabiei and Phoma medicaginis var.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Ab In Chickpeamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sexual reproduction is controlled by a single regulatory locus referred to as a mating-type locus and alternate sequences at the mating-type locus are completely dissimilar and code for different regulatory genes. The presence of opposite mating types (MAT1-1 and MAT1-2) and the teleomorph have been reported from some chickpea-growing regions in the world [24][25][26][27][28][29]. The morphological characteristics of A. rabiei and Phoma medicaginis var.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Ab In Chickpeamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disease reaction of current chickpea cultivars in western Canada ranges from partially resistant to highly susceptible, and no cultivar is totally resistant (Chongo et al 2004). Airborne ascospores play an important role in the dispersal of the pathogen and make disease control difficult (Armstrong et al 2001). Chongo and Gossen (2001) reported that expression of partial resistance declines at the flowering stage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ex tent of ge netic dif fer en ti a tion among subpopula tions ob served in this study was sim i lar to other plant patho gens such as Cryphonectria parasitica subpopulations (Cortesi et al 1996), A.rabiei pop u la tions (Armstrong et al 2001, A.lentis pop u la tions (Banniza and Vandenberg 2006) and Aphanomyces euteiches pop u la tions (Malvick and Percich 1998). Ob tained re sults are not sim i lar to some ascomycete plant patho gens with sim i lar bi ol ogy to heterothallic spe cies P.pinodella (teleomorph Didymella).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Sim i larly still is im pos si ble to make the conven tional ge netic sex ual cross ing and ob tain pseudothecia re gard ing the heterothallic spe cies of Ascochyta (Didymella) pisi and Phoma (Didymella) pinodella due to lack of mat ing type test ers and sen si tive mo lec u lar markers. More de tailed anal y ses on pop u la tion ge net ics of A.pisi, A.pinodes and P.pinodella have be gun since 1997 when mo lec u lar mark ers for the first time were used (Bouznad et al 1995, Faris-Mokaiesh et al 1996, Fatehi and Bridge 1998, Fatehi 2000, Fatehi et al 2003, Onfroy et al 1999, Tohamy and Mohamed 1998, Lubeck et al 1998, Armstrong et al 2001, Peever et al 2002, Fondevilla et al 2006, Zhang et al 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%